Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - boundary=aboriginal_lands

The proposal should be edited to say that this tag should be used for official boundaries of recognized aboriginal / indigenous / native peoples, for example, American Indian Reservations, Canadian First Peoples, Aboriginal Australian etc (Plus the proper terminology for Brazil and other count

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - boundary=aboriginal_lands

This is a bad proposal. We should stick with the boundary=protected_area tag family. As a whole, it's a successful attempt to bring some rational organization to what will over time (or to some extent already has) otherwise develop into a hodge-podge of top level boundary types: boundary=nation

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - boundary=aboriginal_lands

You are both correct that despite my attempted cleanup of the proposal, there still wasn't a good description of what these features actually are in the real world. I added a new description at the top of the page. That's my fault, sorry that I didn't include that before I started the vote. I

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - boundary=aboriginal_lands

On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 at 04:16, Alan McConchie wrote: Good work with getting this proposal resurrected, Alan 2 comments thanks, one of which is *very* nit-picky! This proposal is for mapping the official reservation boundaries of > recognized aboriginal / indigenous / native peoples. These areas

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - boundary=aboriginal_lands

On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 at 06:34, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: > > In Australia, there are two indigenous peoples - the *A*boriginal (not > *a*boriginal) > people > & when I go back & read what I wrote, I've put it down incorrectly :-( Should be Indigenous & Aboriginal peoples! Thanks Graeme __

Re: [Tagging] Proposed features - RFC - Pipe valves

Hi, I think the document is complete, with all expected keys and values for this step https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Pipeline_valves_proposal Let me know if any question remains unanswered. Le jeu. 15 nov. 2018 à 01:12, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> a écrit : > I had no i

[Tagging] How to map a sliding section of the Alaska Pipeline

> ... There is a short section of the Trans-Alaska pipeline that crosses a well-known fault line where it is attached to slides to allow lateral movement in case of an earthquake. I split the pipeline way and added a note to the section but that probably isn't visible to most data consumers. Any id

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - boundary=aboriginal_lands

25. Nov 2018 01:38 by alan.mcconc...@gmail.com : > I'd like to officially open the voting period now, so we can once and for all > come to a conclusion on this 10-year-long discussion. Please review the > discussion on the wiki page and cast your vote at the bo

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - boundary=aboriginal_lands

I would not care too much about support in data consumers, checking what magic number meansduring development is not too problematic. But it is horrible, horrible for mappers that edit tags directly. Maybe this can be hidden in iD,but magic number are obnoxious for all other mappers. 25. Nov 201