[Tagging] Highway=track and piste:type=nordic, are we doing it right ?

I'd like it to be a genuine question and not attract judgements for a particular editor. For a long time, contributors map crosscountry skiing by adding piste:nordic to existing highway=tracks when they follow them. That's about 66% of the 68'000km of crosscountry ski trails mapped or 51165 wa

Re: [Tagging] Opening hours too long for OSM

On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 8:44 PM Simon Poole wrote: > > It is all fine and dandy for us to abstractly discuss such things, it is > another to explain to Josephine mapper that no, the opening hours of the > shop you want to map are one character too long and you need to map less > detail. I just do

Re: [Tagging] Highway=track and piste:type=nordic, are we doing it right ?

13. Oct 2018 09:28 by yve...@mailbox.org : > For a long time, contributors map crosscountry skiing by adding piste:nordic > to existing highway=tracks when they follow them. That's about 66% of the > 68'000km of crosscountry ski trails mapped or 51165 ways. > > I trie

Re: [Tagging] Opening hours too long for OSM

I am not sure why you opened https://github.com/opening-hours/opening_hours.js/issues/270 to discuss new tagging idea. If you want to discuss new tagging ideas then post it on a tagging mailing listor on OSM wiki discussion page. 1

Re: [Tagging] Opening hours too long for OSM

I prefer to not use OSM tags for retaliating against anything. 12. Oct 2018 12:21 by 61sundow...@gmail.com : > If they are going to make it complex ... retaliate and make it simple? >___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openst

Re: [Tagging] highway=crossing used on ways

12. Oct 2018 09:25 by gpetermann_muenc...@hotmail.com : > In November 2015 I fix nearly all such ways, since then the number increased > again to 488. I don't know about iD, but JOSM prints a warning > when you use this tagging, still many edits were made

Re: [Tagging] Opening hours too long for OSM

Are you sure? Google allows to upload special hours via spreadsheet: https://support.google.com/business/answer/6303076?hl=en. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Opening hours too long for OSM

Am 13.10.2018 um 00:46 schrieb Tobias Zwick: > It is already part of the specification that "Mo-Fr 9-17" is possible. Actually it isn't, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours/specification I don't think discussing changes to the opening_hours grammar is this thread is a sens

Re: [Tagging] Opening hours too long for OSM

Oh, you are right. I am sorry. So that opening hours tool understands more than what is defined in the specification. On 13/10/2018 12:35, Simon Poole wrote: > > > Am 13.10.2018 um 00:46 schrieb Tobias Zwick: >> It is already part of the specification that "Mo-Fr 9-17" is possible. > > Actually

Re: [Tagging] Opening hours too long for OSM

Am 13.10.2018 um 13:36 schrieb Tobias Zwick: > Oh, you are right. I am sorry. So that opening hours tool understands > more than what is defined in the specification. Everybody that has written a OH parser needs to add a non-strict mode in one way or the other, or else you wouldn't be able to pa

[Tagging] Feature proposal - Voting - Telecom local networks

Hi all, The vote on the telecom local networks proposal is now open. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Telecom_local_loop It is proposed to use telecom=* to map some physical components of local networks, between exchanges buildings and households or businesses, mainly with wi

Re: [Tagging] Highway=track and piste:type=nordic, are we doing it right ?

In my part of the world I know of several highway=* that are closed in winter and used as nordic ski trails. Not just tracks, I can think of a few that are two lane paved roads used for general vehicular traffic in summer. It makes no sense to me to have two OSM ways sharing the same nodes simpl

Re: [Tagging] Dispensing vs vending (Was: Combined waste/recycling bins)

sent from a phone > On 12. Oct 2018, at 13:51, SelfishSeahorse wrote: > > amenity=parcel_station > parcel_station:send=yes/no > parcel_station:receive=yes/no +1, would be fine for me. or amenity=parcel_machine? I believe packstation is a trademark Cheers, Martin __

Re: [Tagging] Dispensing vs vending (Was: Combined waste/recycling bins)

>> amenity=parcel_station >> parcel_station:send=yes/no >> parcel_station:receive=yes/no maybe it would be better to use more universally applicable tags like parcel:sending parcel:pickup Cheers, Martin ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstr

Re: [Tagging] Dispensing vs vending (Was: Combined waste/recycling bins)

On Sat, 13 Oct 2018 at 17:03, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > > amenity=parcel_station > > parcel_station:send=yes/no > > parcel_station:receive=yes/no > > > +1, would be fine for me. > or amenity=parcel_machine? I'm indifferent to the tag name. Other possibilities are parcel locker or parcel term

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - landuse=governmental

Hello everyone! I am proposing a new tag, landuse=governmental, for marking land that is used for governing: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/landuse%3Dgovernmental Regards Markus ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - landuse=governmental

Thanks for working on this proposal, Markus. I agree that it would be useful to have an approved type of land use for the administrative offices of governments. However, I'm not sure that "governmental" is the best value for the landuse key. I think there would be a risk of mappers finding this t