Re: [Tagging] musical_instrument tag for publicly available musical instruments

I think this is a good idea, but, in the suggestion of Thorsten, I find problematic the use of "access=" tag when instruments are in a bar. Imagine a bar with a private piano is tagged as a point: amenity=bar amenity=musical_instrument musical_instrument=piano access=private It does not make clea

[Tagging] Outdoor deckchairs

There are wooden public deckchairs like these: https://www.haloursynow.pl/img/wysiwig/images/IMG_3515.jpg http://www.pmo.com.pl/media/k2/items/cache/0dc247c07eee71a72cf9409729fb3455_XL.jpg http://gloskoninski.pl/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/lezaki-park-ojc-w-konin-kbo-2.jpg I think they are som

Re: [Tagging] musical_instrument tag for publicly available musical instruments

On 29/04/2018 06:12, e1k wrote: ... a growing number of bars, train stations and or other public places have musical instruments around where i live (Amsterdam area), and i've started noticing and collecting these places, and would love to tag them in openstreetmap. use case: as a musician tha

Re: [Tagging] musical_instrument tag for publicly available musical instruments

Hello all, i think that subtags are necessary for all types of shops but may be the same for every (non-food) type of shop, as all of them usually offer the same (besides sales), so the following may apply : musical_instrument:sales=* musical_instrument:rental=* musical_instrument:repair=* musica

Re: [Tagging] musical_instrument tag for publicly available musical instruments

Obviously, you would have to use a separate node inside the area that is tagged as the bar to tag the piano… If you want to go into this much detail about what’s inside the bar (or anything else for that matter), tagging the area and then putting things inside it is much more manageable then

Re: [Tagging] musical_instrument tag for publicly available musical instruments

Yes, but how do you know you are tagging the right area? My gps has a error of +-5 metres, more when indoors. And no one goes to a bar at 2 am and starts asking drunk people to go away in order to measure its perimeter. El dom., 29 de abril de 2018 12:02, escribió: > Obviously, you would have to

Re: [Tagging] Outdoor deckchairs

On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 10:01 AM, Tomasz Wójcik wrote: > There are wooden public deckchairs like these: > They look very uncomfortable. Perhaps they're not as bad as they look. > I think they are something different than bench and need separate tag, > like "amenity=deckchair". What do you thi

Re: [Tagging] Outdoor deckchairs

On 29 April 2018 at 20:36, Paul Allen wrote: > I think an argument can be made for not calling them benches. I just > think they shouldn't be called deckchairs. > > Daybeds? http://www.timbersteel.com.au/day_bed_maureen_oiled__9_.jpg Maybe sun lounge would be a better choice? http://streetfu

Re: [Tagging] Outdoor deckchairs

Il giorno dom 29 apr 2018 alle ore 11:03 Tomasz Wójcik ha scritto: > There are wooden public deckchairs like these: > > https://www.haloursynow.pl/img/wysiwig/images/IMG_3515.jpg > > > http://www.pmo.com.pl/media/k2/items/cache/0dc247c07eee71a72cf9409729fb3455_XL.jpg > > > http://gloskoninski.pl/

Re: [Tagging] Outdoor deckchairs

On 30/04/18 07:22, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: On 29 April 2018 at 20:36, Paul Allen > wrote:   I think an argument can be made for not calling them benches.  I just think they shouldn't be called deckchairs. Daybeds? http://www.timbersteel.com.au/day_bed_m

Re: [Tagging] Outdoor deckchairs

On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 10:22 PM, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: > > > > On 29 April 2018 at 20:36, Paul Allen wrote: > > >> I think an argument can be made for not calling them benches. I just >> think they shouldn't be called deckchairs. >> >> > Daybeds? http://www.timbersteel.com.au/day_bed_mau

Re: [Tagging] Outdoor deckchairs

Amenity=bench with a subtag seems a good idea for data consumers. Yves Le 29 avril 2018 23:47:25 GMT+02:00, Paul Allen a écrit : >On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 10:22 PM, Graeme Fitzpatrick > >wrote: > >> >> >> >> On 29 April 2018 at 20:36, Paul Allen wrote: >> >> >>> I think an argument can be made