Re: [Tagging] windthrow areas (=forest destroyed by winds, =windfall)

Would the trees naturally regenerate? There should be seeds left behind by the old trees that would grow to replace the old trees. So the area should be covered with trees .. young trees but still trees. I much prefer landcover=* to natural and would use landcover=trees for this situation. On 16

Re: [Tagging] windthrow areas (=forest destroyed by winds, =windfall)

I can understand the desire for distinct tagging. Certainly, it's much tougher to navigate a field of blowdown / prone forest like https://www.flickr.com/photos/ke9tv/14738421885/ than it is to walk through a standing forest. Nevertheless, they are both landuse=forest (if managed for forestry) an

Re: [Tagging] windthrow areas (=forest destroyed by winds, =windfall)

On Fri, 16 Mar 2018 17:26:27 -0400 Kevin Kenny wrote: > I can understand the desire for distinct tagging. > > Certainly, it's much tougher to navigate a field of blowdown / prone > forest like > https://www.flickr.com/photos/ke9tv/14738421885/ > than it is to walk through a standing forest. Als

Re: [Tagging] 'Unknown' value.

Hello, > wheelchair=unknown mostly in Iraq and Saudi Arabia (also from older imports) Many months before this thread, talk for an automated edit was started to cleanup 15k+ objets with this value (most due to a wheelmap bug and bad undocumented import, but not only). As the wiki said, for whe

Re: [Tagging] windthrow areas (=forest destroyed by winds, =windfall)

On Sat, 17 Mar 2018 07:02:07 +1100 Frank Warner <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > Would the trees naturally regenerate? > There should be seeds left behind by the old trees that would grow to > replace the old trees. So the area should be covered with trees .. > young trees but still trees. > > I

Re: [Tagging] windthrow areas (=forest destroyed by winds, =windfall)

A young forest is still a forest. On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 2:47 PM, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > On Sat, 17 Mar 2018 07:02:07 +1100 > Frank Warner <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Would the trees naturally regenerate? > > > There should be seeds left behind by the old trees that would grow to >

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - shop=cannabis

Greetings tagging list, I got a little nudge from the community and a helping hand to revitalize the shop=cannabis tagging proposal. Since it's been several years since the original RFC, we'll just consider this a new one. Please take a moment to review:

Re: [Tagging] 'Unknown' value.

On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 5:46 PM, marc marc wrote: > SomeonElse write me today because since access=unknown could have a > hidden meaning (= for access key, the mapper doesn't know if access is > allowed and wants to make it known that it's complicated), he finds that > this cleaning should be reve

Re: [Tagging] 'Unknown' value.

On 16/03/2018 21:46, marc marc wrote: SomeonElse write me today because since access=unknown could have a hidden meaning (= for access key, the mapper doesn't know if access is allowed and wants to make it known that it's complicated) What I actually said was on https://www.openstreetmap.org/c

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - shop=cannabis

Russ - Looks good. We have Cannabis shops opening left and right in Washington State. I've only mapped the one I visit but need to get out and "map" the rest. Tough job. Clifford On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 3:27 PM, wrote: > Greetings tagging list, > > > > I got a little nudge from the community an

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - shop=cannabis

Here, Cliff :-) ( from https://lcb.wa.gov/records/frequently-requested-lists ): Marijuana License Applicants (contains both applicants and issued licenses) When active licenses come up for renewal or ar