Hi Paul,
2018-02-12 17:12 GMT+01:00 Paul Allen :
> Does that help or make matters worse?
>
Thank you for your contribution.
Given problem is cluttering waterway=* key a bit more with additional
values may not be accepted.
According to comments, I should use established values and the only one
a
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 03:26:07PM +0100, François Lacombe wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> 2018-02-12 17:12 GMT+01:00 Paul Allen :
>
> > Does that help or make matters worse?
> >
>
> Thank you for your contribution.
>
> Given problem is cluttering waterway=* key a bit more with additional
> values may no
Le 13. 02. 18 à 23:09, Richard a écrit :
>> the only one added is waterway=pressurised.
>
> why not pipeline for this?
maybe because a siphon is not a pipeline :)
and it's a good thing to have a continuity "of water" with waterway=*
___
Tagging mailing
On 13/02/2018 22:14, marc marc wrote:
Le 13. 02. 18 à 23:09, Richard a écrit :
the only one added is waterway=pressurised.
why not pipeline for this?
maybe because a siphon is not a pipeline :)
By what definition? The pipeline that
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/203739284 would be consi
On 14-Feb-18 09:14 AM, marc marc wrote:
Le 13. 02. 18 à 23:09, Richard a écrit :
the only one added is waterway=pressurised.
why not pipeline for this?
maybe because a siphon is not a pipeline :)
Umm? A siphon is made from a pipeline .. so it is a 'pipeline'.
and it's a good thing to have
Le 13. 02. 18 à 23:57, Warin a écrit :
> On 14-Feb-18 09:14 AM, marc marc wrote:
>> Le 13. 02. 18 à 23:09, Richard a écrit :
the only one added is waterway=pressurised.
>>> why not pipeline for this?
>> maybe because a siphon is not a pipeline :)
>
> Umm? A siphon is made from a pipeline
did
On 14-Feb-18 10:22 AM, marc marc wrote:
Le 13. 02. 18 à 23:57, Warin a écrit :
On 14-Feb-18 09:14 AM, marc marc wrote:
Le 13. 02. 18 à 23:09, Richard a écrit :
the only one added is waterway=pressurised.
why not pipeline for this?
maybe because a siphon is not a pipeline :)
Umm? A siphon is
Hi,
2018-02-14 0:51 GMT+01:00 Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>:
> In the diagram
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/images/thumb/e/e6/Waterway_
> flows.png/500px-Waterway_flows.png
>
> The upper ones may well be man made - so the tags waterway=canal,
> tunnel=yes could be replace by
> man_made=pipe
Le 14. 02. 18 à 00:51, Warin a écrit :
> OSM unfortunately 'maps what is there' .. not "hardware"/"use".
a water flow is there -> waterway=* (the same logic as for highway=*)
we already map "hardware" for road (surface) for building
(building:material). did we need to delete those ?
> In the dia
On 14-Feb-18 11:05 AM, marc marc wrote:
Le 14. 02. 18 à 00:51, Warin a écrit :
OSM unfortunately 'maps what is there' .. not "hardware"/"use".
a water flow is there -> waterway=* (the same logic as for highway=*)
we already map "hardware" for road (surface) for building
(building:material). did
Le 14. 02. 18 à 01:25, Warin a écrit :
> On 14-Feb-18 11:05 AM, marc marc wrote:
>> Le 14. 02. 18 à 00:51, Warin a écrit :
>>> OSM unfortunately 'maps what is there' .. not "hardware"/"use".
>> a water flow is there -> waterway=* (the same logic as for highway=*)
>> we already map "hardware" for ro
11 matches
Mail list logo
