The wiki has an example for a wayside shrine which I wouldn't classify as
"shrine", it's rather a column, no space inside:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Eleonorens%C3%A4ule_Penzing.jpg
What do you think, shall we remove the image?
Context:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:histo
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 10:28 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
> The wiki has an example for a wayside shrine which I wouldn't classify as
> "shrine", it's rather a column, no space inside:
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Eleonorens%C3%A4ule_Penzing.jpg
If a symbol is sacred (even if it'
Yes.
According to this description in French [1], to be defined as "oratoire" /
"shrine", there should be a cavity to exhibit something (with a cross, a roof,
etc.).
So, it's also my interpretation that the picture is more a column than a shrine.
[1] http://www.les-oratoires.asso.fr/presentati
sent from a phone
> On 12. Feb 2018, at 13:39, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
>
> If a symbol is sacred (even if it's a column) and people use it for
> praying/worshiping, is really there any difference from a a small
> building with a space inside?
I think it is about terminology, for instanc
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 10:47 AM, OSMDoudou
<19b350d2-b1b3-4edb-ad96-288ea1238...@gmx.com> wrote:
> According to this description in French [1], to be defined as "oratoire" /
> "shrine", there should be a cavity to exhibit something (with a cross, a
> roof, etc.).
Maybe the definition of a "shri
sent from a phone
> On 12. Feb 2018, at 14:06, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
>
> For example, this Buddhist shrine doesn't seem to have any space or
> cavity (the Buddha is placed on an altar, it seems).
> http://www.buddhistchannel.tv/index.php?id=61,12053,0,0,1,0
I’m wouldn’t call this a wa
For me it is something that I would describe as shrine and it is certainly
the same in function.
I guess that to solve that somebody should check how "shrine" tends to be
defined (I am not a native speaker of English).
On 12 Feb 2018 1:30 p.m., "Martin Koppenhoefer"
wrote:
> The wiki has an exa
There could be some bias on the translation.
As an example, the name ID gives to it in Spanish (santuario al borde del
camino=holy place close to a road) is somehow arbitrary.
As most beginners read the translated
tag name only, and different languages make different segmentations of
reality, havi
Hi everybody,
The hydro power waterway proposal has been updated to take care of several
useful comments made during the last vote.
Here is a changelog :
- Moving from waterway=drain to waterway=canal since a drain is mainly
intended to remove superfluous water. A canal carries water from A to B
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 3:44 PM, François Lacombe wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> The hydro power waterway proposal has been updated to take care of several
> useful comments made during the last vote.
>
> Here is a changelog :
> - Moving from waterway=drain to waterway=canal since a drain is mainly
>
Nice,thank you for processing and wiki completions ;DGreets,ReboOn 12 Feb 2018 1:06 AM, marc marc wrote:Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56277877
the POC for the first part
Regards,
Marc
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetma
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 8:55 AM, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
> For me it is something that I would describe as shrine and it is certainly
> the same in function.
>
> I guess that to solve that somebody should check how "shrine" tends to be
> defined (I am not a native speaker of English).
For what i
There is another type of a combination of open waterway, underground
waterway, and pressurised waterway/pipeline:
a siphon (see [1]). This is a frequent situation here in northern Italy.
They came in all sizes, and there are hundreds of them around here.
The technical trick with these is that the l
sent from a phone
> On 12. Feb 2018, at 18:55, Kevin Kenny wrote:
>
> The key aspect is that it is a pilgrimage site
nice research on “shrine” in catholic law, but we’re discussing “wayside
shrine”, which is, as I understand it, not any shrine with a way nearby
(because every church has at
Hi
There were quite a few additions of cycleway:both=no and lanes=1 tags
to residential roads and living streets recently, which makes me
wonder if it might make sense to define cycleway:both=no and lanes=1
as default values for highway=residential and highway=living_street on
the wiki. What do yo
> On Feb 12, 2018, at 1:02 PM, Selfish Seahorse
> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> There were quite a few additions of cycleway:both=no and lanes=1 tags
> to residential roads and living streets recently, which makes me
> wonder if it might make sense to define cycleway:both=no and lanes=1
> as default value
Hello,
Le 12. 02. 18 à 22:02, Selfish Seahorse a écrit :
> There were quite a few additions of cycleway:both=no and lanes=1 tags
> to residential roads and living streets recently, which makes me
> wonder if it might make sense to define cycleway:both=no and lanes=1
> as default values for highway
> Nearly all the residential roads in my part of the world should default to
> lanes=2.
What drives me crazy is in my neighborhood, the residential roads are
physically wide enough for 3 lanes, but with parking lanes on both
sides, and some are still signed for two-way traffic. Winds up being
lik
> Nearly all the residential roads in my part of the world should default to
> lanes=2.
OK, I didn't know that (this is why I asked). Thanks for your reply!
On 12 February 2018 at 22:09, Tod Fitch wrote:
>
>> On Feb 12, 2018, at 1:02 PM, Selfish Seahorse
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> There were q
> I don't see how it would be possible to set a default global value.
I thought that just mentioning them in the wiki would be enough (like
the default access restrictions). But as residential roads with more
than one lane seem to be common elsewhere, there is no need for such a
global default val
Mentioning defaults on the wiki is not machine-readable. We've been
talking about this for a while now - can someone please set up a
separate channel for a discussion about the mechanism for setting
defaults?
Matej Lieskovský
On 12 February 2018 at 22:28, Selfish Seahorse
wrote:
>> I don't see h
On 13-Feb-18 08:16 AM, Bill Ricker wrote:
Nearly all the residential roads in my part of the world should default to
lanes=2.
What drives me crazy is in my neighborhood, the residential roads are
physically wide enough for 3 lanes, but with parking lanes on both
sides, and some are still signed
22 matches
Mail list logo
