Hello
I have a problem. I was remapping subway stations in Barcelona (Spain),
following https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Metro_Mapping . Also I was
connecting the stations with some indoor mapping, with corridors as ways
and tags with levels, basically, but they doesn't appear in OpenLevelUp f
Le 26. 01. 18 à 10:13, yo paseopor a écrit :
> I was remapping subway stations in Barcelona
> (Spain), following https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Metro_Mapping .
It should be better to move this to /proposed_feature/
to avoid misleading people.
The small banner seems not enought to warn that
Greetings!
Several Slavic languages have rather formal rules about line breaks.
We in Czechia have a few contributors who take the time to add
nonbreakable spaces to names that "need" them. Needless to say, the
current situation is rather inconsistent, with nonbreakable spaces
occurring in the dat
Can you elaborate a bit more?
26-01-2018 17:48 tarihinde Matej Lieskovský yazdı:
> Greetings!
>
> Several Slavic languages have rather formal rules about line breaks.
> We in Czechia have a few contributors who take the time to add
> nonbreakable spaces to names that "need" them. Needless to say,
Le 26. 01. 18 à 15:48, Matej Lieskovský a écrit :
> Several Slavic languages have rather formal rules about line breaks.
it depends on whether it is a grammar rule or a "char".
In French, it is a rule to know how to cut a word at the end of a line.
Since it's a grammar rule, I don't see any point
In Czech, a nonbreakable space should follow any single-letter
preposition or conjunction and academic or military titles. A
nonbreakable space should also be used due to some common
contractions, between a number and a unit, and around some punctuation
marks.
I noticed that some Overpass queries
@marc: I just realized - I'm not talking about breaking words between
syllables but about breaking lines between words. It is not adding a
character, just using a nonbreakable version of a space. Sorry if I'm
not being clear.
On 26 January 2018 at 16:47, Matej Lieskovský
wrote:
> In Czech, a nonb
I think it would be best to make the tools we use JOSM, Overpass API, iD,
etc. Unicode aware, so they can handle this correctly.
Polyglot
2018-01-26 16:50 GMT+01:00 Matej Lieskovský :
> @marc: I just realized - I'm not talking about breaking words between
> syllables but about breaking lines bet
Your explanation clearly spoke of a space between words.
I was referring to syllables only as an example.
In French also there are nonbreakable space like for "M. Dupont".
I don't think it's the right place to put grammar rules in osm.
imho we need a place where all tools that need it can retrieve
On 26/01/2018 14:48, Matej Lieskovský wrote:
... we reached out
to the DWG, which did not solve the dispute.
For completeness, I actually suggested posting here rather than have the
DWG issue a "commandment" - I have some knowledge of Czech and Czech
grammar but not much, and it made sense to
> (and yes, there are cases when you should use a contraction)
name=* is full form. Not abbreviated in any way.
Yours, faithfully
Erkin Alp
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
2018-01-26 19:09 GMT+01:00 Erkin Alp Güney :
> > (and yes, there are cases when you should use a contraction)
> name=* is full form. Not abbreviated in any way.
There are also other name tags, in particular "official_name", which also
are about full (and official) forms. E.g. name=Italia
offic
@Erkin: Yes, but the full form can contain a contraction. There is an
public transport stop in Prague called "I. P. Pavlova" and (unlike the
nearby "náměstí Ivana Petroviče Pavlova") it is ALWAYS written as an
abbreviation. Signs, official documents, spoken language... there is a
point after which
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 09:09:12PM +0300, Erkin Alp Güney wrote:
> > (and yes, there are cases when you should use a contraction)
> name=* is full form. Not abbreviated in any way.
this is about the case where the official name is an abbreviation,
happens often enough.
Richard
__
During discussing rendering of artwork in Louvre:
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/3031
it became non obvious to me what is the "public art" and what should be
definition on the wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dartwork
Currently it's defined a
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 03:48:42PM +0100, Matej Lieskovský wrote:
> Greetings!
>
> Several Slavic languages have rather formal rules about line breaks.
the problem is much broader, sooner or later OSM rendering will hit word
splitting.
> PS: The rules are formal enough that there exists a 1997
I don't see exhibitions in museums following the definition of public art.
While they are accessible to the public when visiting the museum, they are not as accessible as an
outdoor installation in urban spaces.
There should be a different tagging scheme for them, e.g. exhibit=artwork
tom
On 2
On 27 January 2018 at 06:00, Daniel Koć wrote:
> During discussing rendering of artwork in Louvre:
>
> https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/3031
>
> it became non obvious to me what is the "public art" and what should be
> definition on the wiki:
>
> https://wiki.openstreetm
Hello,
I can't find how to properly tag this place. [1]
No name pops to mind to represent its purpose: forum, amphitheatre,
pedestrian, speakers corner, etc. don't correspond to suitable tags.
I see a "circle area made of steps where you can sit and meet people", but
that won't make a good tag..
On 27 January 2018 at 08:35, OSMDoudou <
19b350d2-b1b3-4edb-ad96-288ea1238...@gmx.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I can't find how to properly tag this place. [1]
>
> No name pops to mind to represent its purpose: forum, amphitheatre,
> pedestrian, speakers corner, etc. don't correspond to suitable tags.
I would tag the entire place between buildings as place=square, the flat
surfaces as highway=pedestrian+area=yes, the steps as area steps [1] and
the bleachers as leisure=bleachers.
[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Area-steps
Javier
El 26 ene. 2018 22:36, "OSMDoudou" <
1
Le 26. 01. 18 à 23:35, OSMDoudou a écrit :
> I see
> [1] https://goo.gl/maps/toZ8QvVUB7w
I see a licensing problem.
please give a valid source instead of using an invalid one
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.
It is perfectly fine to use copyrighted maps, images etc during discussion.
We may not make edits based on them but it does not extend to banning
linking to them in discussions.
On 27 Jan 2018 12:32 a.m., "marc marc" wrote:
> Le 26. 01. 18 à 23:35, OSMDoudou a écrit :
> > I see
> > [1] https://
I see a licensing problem.
Why?
As long as OSMDoudou is using a valid source to map, it doesn't matter
how he refers the information to the rest of us.
DaveF
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listin
HTML has for non-breakable spaces (Unicode U+00A0).
HTML has for soft hyphens (Unicode U+00AD).
--
Message: 2
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 23:04:32 +0100
From: Richard
To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools"
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Nonbreakable spaces
2018-01-26 23:34 GMT+01:00 Graeme Fitzpatrick :
> My thought would be that "public artwork" is, as the wiki suggests,
> artwork (be in murals, statues or whatever) in the street, park, shopping
> centre or foyer of an open building ie publicly accessible, without payment
> of an entry fee.
>
> By
26 matches
Mail list logo
