On 25/01/2018 21:16, Fernando Trebien wrote:
Then please say so in the public mailing list and let's see other
people's answers.
OK
Synopsis of my private conversation with Fernanado:
The links he provides do not "suggest that such role should not be used."
The description in [2] is giving cl
Hi all,
Due to interesting remarks made while voting, vote is now closed and
delayed until some work will be done.
This discussion can be continued as needed following your concern.
Thank you for your ideas and remarks so far.
François
___
Tagging ma
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 7:53 PM, Dave F wrote:
> The links he provides do not "suggest that such role should not be used."
> The description in [2] is giving clear instruction where 'forward/backward'
> roles
> *can* be used.
> He says "The role is missing" from [2]. It's unclear what he means.
I
On 25-Jan-18 05:53 AM, Helge Fahrnberger wrote:
Hi Marc,
I did send an RFC, over a year ago:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2016-September/030270.html
Caused some positive comments on the discussion page and quite some
people actually using the tag.
As for the text on th
sent from a phone
> On 26. Jan 2018, at 00:57, Fernando Trebien
> wrote:
>
> Change the tag "type" to
> anything else and you'll still get a warning saying that "route" is
> not an expected role.
is there docu about role “route” ? If this is established you should open a
ticket in josm tra
