Re: [Tagging] a tag for "really-really-freestores"

2017-12-06 Thread thomas schwaerzler
thank you for that hint! i think i will stick to that idea. best t. On 12/05/2017 11:58 AM, Selfish Seahorse wrote: > Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: >> the obvious proposal would be >> amenity=freeshop or give-away_shop or sth similar, if you want to avoid the >> shop key. > Good idea! That see

Re: [Tagging] Deprecating of leisure=common and leisure=village_green

2017-12-06 Thread Tom Pfeifer
On 05.12.2017 20:40, Marc Zoutendijk wrote:> Martin, did you see the pictures I have added to the wiki? [1] Nice pictures, but they belong onto the discussion page, as it is _not_ an 'alternative' use, it is a use _against_ the original definition. For me landcover=urban_green (maybe: urban_ve

[Tagging] amenity=atm + man_made=surveillance

2017-12-06 Thread Fernando Trebien
Hello, The wiki recently received this edit: [1] But I didn't find any discussion on this here. Do you agree that it is adequate to combine amenity=atm with man_made=surveillance on the same element? The article on man_made [2] says that the tag is intended for structures on a landscape, which s

Re: [Tagging] Deprecating of leisure=common and leisure=village_green

2017-12-06 Thread Warin
On 07-Dec-17 03:28 AM, Tom Pfeifer wrote: On 05.12.2017 20:40, Marc Zoutendijk wrote:> Martin, did you see the pictures I have added to the wiki? [1] Nice pictures, but they belong onto the discussion page, as it is _not_ an 'alternative' use, it is a use _against_ the original definition. Fo

Re: [Tagging] amenity=atm + man_made=surveillance

2017-12-06 Thread Steve Doerr
On 06/12/2017 17:29, Fernando Trebien wrote: Do you agree that it is adequate to combine amenity=atm with man_made=surveillance on the same element? Yes, if the ATM incorporates a surveillance camera. -- Steve --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://ww

Re: [Tagging] Deprecating of leisure=common and leisure=village_green

2017-12-06 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 6. Dec 2017, at 17:28, Tom Pfeifer wrote: > > Nice pictures, but they belong onto the discussion page, as it is _not_ an > 'alternative' use, it is a use _against_ the original definition. I agree with Tom. I understand you have been using landuse=village_green in yo

Re: [Tagging] amenity=atm + man_made=surveillance

2017-12-06 Thread Nelson A. de Oliveira
On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 3:29 PM, Fernando Trebien wrote: > But I didn't find any discussion on this here. Do you agree that it is > adequate to combine amenity=atm with man_made=surveillance on the same > element? No... It could use another tag or namespace for this, but not man_made=surveillance

[Tagging] amenity=atm + man_made=surveillance

2017-12-06 Thread nwastra
On 7 Dec 2017, at 10:07 am, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote: >> But I didn't find any discussion on this here. Do you agree that it is >> adequate to combine amenity=atm with man_made=surveillance on the same >> element? I also think that man_made=surveillance is not a suitable tag for reasons alr

Re: [Tagging] Proposed Features - RFC - Penstock waterways

2017-12-06 Thread François Lacombe
Hi all, The proposal has been edited following some useful comments https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Hydropower_water_supplies Edit summary: Drop waterway=penstock Introduce waterway=duct for pipe-flow waterways only (opposite from drains where water flows freely with an open

Re: [Tagging] Proposed Features - RFC - Penstock waterways

2017-12-06 Thread Andrew Davidson
At least two problems: 1. waterway is the wrong key. Waterways are for open-channel features. There is already a man_made=pipeline for pipe flow. I'm not sure why we need a different tag for this. 2. duct is the wrong value. Ducts refers to low pressure pipes carrying gases. _