Re: [Tagging] mandatory restriction with via way as members

sent from a phone > On 2. May 2017, at 08:53, Michael Tsang wrote: > > What would you say this restriction means? Does it mean that once a vehicle > starts the from way it must go along the whole length to the to way? it means you can't go any other way than to the to way, you might stop th

Re: [Tagging] wikipedia links and copy + paste in tag definitions

sent from a phone > On 2. May 2017, at 02:17, Frederik Ramm wrote: > > But without knowing a lot about the story and mechanisms behind it, the > link you quoted above doesn't seem wrong. It is not called "castle" but > "structure tagged as historic=castle in OSM", and the only things it > seem

[Tagging] Very large multipolygons

Hi, I have removed three very large multipolygons from OSM today. * I DELETED a "place=sea" for the Adriatic Sea (http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4590486) because I think we shouldn't even start with that kind of thing (place=ocean name=Atlantic anyone?). * I CHANGED a "type=multipolygo

Re: [Tagging] mandatory restriction with via way as members

Am 02.05.2017 um 10:11 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer: On 2. May 2017, at 08:53, Michael Tsang wrote: What would you say this restriction means? Does it mean that once a vehicle starts the from way it must go along the whole length to the to way? it means you can't go any other way than to the

Re: [Tagging] Very large multipolygons

Am 02.05.2017 um 11:05 schrieb Frederik Ramm: Hi, I have removed three very large multipolygons from OSM today. * I DELETED a "place=sea" for the Adriatic Sea (http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4590486) because I think we shouldn't even start with that kind of thing (place=ocean name=At

Re: [Tagging] Very large multipolygons

On Tuesday 02 May 2017, Frederik Ramm wrote: > [...] > > I realize that what I've done here is close to "mapping for the data > extractor" and I'm offering these decisions for discussion here. I > definitely think none of the three areas qualifies as a proper > "multipolygon" and *if* these huge ar

[Tagging] RFC: Change the definition of key:aeroway to include space flight related infrastructure

Please comment on the discussion page of the proposal: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/include_spacecraft_in_aeroway Cheers, Martin ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Very large multipolygons

2017-05-02 12:10 GMT+02:00 Christoph Hormann : > I agree there is no point in mapping this kind of feature as > multipolygons in OSM but i disagree that changing type=multipolygon to > type=boundary makes it any better. > +1 I thought about how this kind of feature could be represented in OSM

Re: [Tagging] aeroway=spaceport, aeroway=launchpad, aeroway=landingpad

2017-05-01 23:14 GMT+02:00 Thilo Haug OSM : > [...] changing without reviewing cases individually this one? It leaves a bit of a bad taste if you declare on the mailing list 'I'm getting tired of this "discussion and proposal" stuff' and then it gets discovered you downloaded and modified the

[Tagging] Bus stop without infrastructure

Hi, I started to gather some info about existing practices to map and tag bus stops without infrastructure. Please read there: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:public_transport%3Dplatform#Bus_stop_without_infrastructure I would appreciate your comments and additions. -- althio