I have a feeling that "living street" is being interpreted as "a street
that people live on", which really should be "residential". Perhaps you
could ask the mapper for the reason behind the edits, and ask someone to
translate the "living street" wiki page to indicate clearly what it means
(in Jap
I've learned a lot from the comments here, based on others comments I
think the solution to my issue is to use a tag like like
coastline=pelagic (from wikipedia "A pelagic coast refers to a coast
which fronts the open ocean, as opposed to a more sheltered coast in a
gulf or bay.") on the oceanic co
I would agree with Andrew, the translation of Living Street probably makes
a lot of sense in other languages, I've seen the same tagging pattern in
South America.
Maybe a suggestion would be that the value be removed from the pick list
option in iD. There is no reason that all possible choices shou
sent from a phone
> On 29 Mar 2017, at 01:39, Greg Troxel wrote:
>
> a name for a particular location, generally known to the inhabitants
> of surrounding areas, and whose naming significant is other than as a
> name for a population center, such that one of the settlement
> hierarchy term
Martin Koppenhoefer writes:
> sent from a phone
>
>> On 29 Mar 2017, at 01:39, Greg Troxel wrote:
>>
>> a name for a particular location, generally known to the inhabitants
>> of surrounding areas, and whose naming significant is other than as a
>> name for a population center, such that on
Hi, Javbw
>is this some systemic regional tagging change that is not documented?
There is no such agreement in Japanese community, AFAIK.
So I think it's error of that mapper.
Wiki:ja says "there is no 'living street' category in Japan" and "Tag such
street as highway=residential+maxspeed=20or30"
sent from a phone
> On 29 Mar 2017, at 14:00, Andrew Harvey wrote:
>
> I'd also like to consider how to tag rias, so we can differentiate
> between a ria and the open ocean.
the tag is natural=ria
cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagg
On 29.3.2017 01:11, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
sent from a phone
On 28 Mar 2017, at 23:28, Michal Fabík wrote:
historic=tombstone + tombstone=stećak
+ probably the most accurate
- not well established (just one occurrence of historic=tombstone according to
taginfo.osm.org)
- not sure whet
An exact limit between the open ocean and a sheltered coast is too
arbitrary as natural feature. It seems a political issue. You can use
boundary=maritime + border_type=baseline for excluding internal waters
from the open ocean, according of laws of the country. Check the article
https://en.wik
On Wednesday 29 March 2017, Juan Pablo Tolosa Sanzana wrote:
> An exact limit between the open ocean and a sheltered coast is too
> arbitrary as natural feature. It seems a political issue. [...]
No, it is not a political issue, the position of the baseline is not in
doubt here. If Andrew wants
> On Mar 29, 2017, at 9:57 PM, tomoya muramoto wrote:
>
> Hi, Javbw
>
> >is this some systemic regional tagging change that is not documented?
> There is no such agreement in Japanese community, AFAIK.
> So I think it's error of that mapper.
Thanks. If you could message the user in (better)
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 4:41 AM, Juan Pablo Tolosa Sanzana <
jptolosanz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> An exact limit between the open ocean and a sheltered coast is too
> arbitrary as natural feature. It seems a political issue. You can use
> boundary=maritime + border_type=baseline for excluding interna
I don't know the Australian baseline, this is only an example. Sometimes
the countries define a straight baseline that close a bay. Of course,
Andrew have the freedoom to use, e.g. the tag description=* to do the
mentioned difference.
> No, it is not a political issue, the position of the base
By default baselines match with mean low water spring, meanwhile
natural=coastline is tagged at mean high water spring.
It would be good define some rules related to maritime boundaries don't
agree with UNCLOS, .e.g. peruvian boundary extends up 200 miles away the
coastline.
OK I will send a message to him.
muramoto
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Hello,
Just a information.
We had a similar discussion on talk-ja. (2016 oct)
We could not reach the detailed consensus at that time.
But there are some rare case to match "highway=living_street" such as the
one named "Zone 30" public highway/road in Japanese situation.
* thread:
https://lists.o
16 matches
Mail list logo
