Re: [Tagging] traffic_signals:direction=* vs. direction=*

2017-03-26 Thread Paul Johnson
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 7:44 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > 2017-03-23 10:30 GMT+01:00 Jean-Marc Liotier : > >> As the "complex intersections" section of the highway=traffic_signals >> page describes a gradation of model complexity >> (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtraffic

Re: [Tagging] Adding directionality to stop signs

2017-03-26 Thread Paul Johnson
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 6:45 PM, yo paseopor wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 11:31 AM, Paul Johnson > wrote: > >> >> Turn restrictions are extremely common and managed using relations, so we >> know relations don't have to be hard. It's possible for the editors to >> adapt to make this easy.

Re: [Tagging] Landuse for vacant lots

2017-03-26 Thread Paul Johnson
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 4:41 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > "brownfield" seems quite misleading as description for a plot formerly > occupied by a house, it would be appropriate for former industrial or > commercial areas with suspected pollution (in case of former industrial and > some kind o

Re: [Tagging] traffic_signals:direction=* vs. direction=*

2017-03-26 Thread Marc Gemis
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 12:57 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > generally it is unsafe to rely on a "direction" like forward or backward as > tag on a node. Nodes do not have directions, and there is no relation from a > node to a single way, the relation is from a way to a node and many ways can >

Re: [Tagging] traffic_signals:direction=* vs. direction=*

2017-03-26 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 26 Mar 2017, at 09:48, Paul Johnson wrote: > > Not to sound like a broken record, but what exactly would be so complicated > about adapting the existing and adopted enforcement style relations to stop > and give way devices? This completely removes ambiguity and guess

Re: [Tagging] traffic_signals:direction=* vs. direction=*

2017-03-26 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 26 Mar 2017, at 17:43, Marc Gemis wrote: > > I've been adding maybe hundreds of stop & give ways signs if you're mapping signs (traffic_sign=*) I think you should map them where they are, if you map the effects of signs, map it to where it applies. cheers, Martin __

Re: [Tagging] Landuse for vacant lots

2017-03-26 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 26 Mar 2017, at 15:41, Paul Johnson wrote: > > I've usually heard "brownfield" in a city planning context to be any formerly > built property that is left void of any buildings, save possibly for leftover > bits of parking lot, driveway or foundation. Often the sad re