sent from a phone
> On 3 Mar 2017, at 23:04, Christian Müller wrote:
>
> It may be redundant, but it's far from useless.
it may seem redundant, and if you assume construction sites to be unique for a
certain piece of land you would be right, but there are exceptions. There are
really build
sent from a phone
> On 4 Mar 2017, at 07:24, Yves wrote:
>
> If there is a signage, then we should map the signage.
I don't agree that mapping the signage would be particularly helpful, besides
there's no tag for this kind of signs, these sign objects wouldn't be connected
to the relevant
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
Am 2017-03-02 um 20:21 schrieb Michael Reichert:
> Because the proposal violated the guideline, I would like to -
> remove the status "proposed" from its feature documentation page -
> reset the status of the proposal to "RFC" - to declare the v
With signage I meant a particular signage, such as 'Recommended by the xyz
motorcycle club', recognized in some way and defined outside of OSM.
This kind of sign is rather frequent, and mapping them moves away from OSM the
rating temptation.
OK for tagging a three-star hotel stars=3, not for I_
sent from a phone
> On 4 Mar 2017, at 13:50, Yves wrote:
>
> With signage I meant a particular signage, such as 'Recommended by the xyz
> motorcycle club', recognized in some way and defined outside of OSM.
> This kind of sign is rather frequent, and mapping them moves away from OSM
> the r
Hi,
Am 2017-03-04 um 15:02 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
> mapping this kind of information (e.g. michelin star restaurants ) in a
> structured and systematic way is likely forbidden because it means recreating
> a (probably) proprietary db
IMHO this is the only way who the friendliness of a PO
Weitergeleitete Nachricht
Betreff:Feature Proposal - RFC - tag "motorcycle friendly" for
accomodations
Datum: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 14:08:10 +0100
Von:Thilo
An: tagging@openstreetmap.org
Hello all,
please check this proposal :
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/
Please check where this mail has been gone, reason :
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2017-March/031403.html
Weitergeleitete Nachricht
Betreff:Feature Proposal - Voting - tag "motorcycle friendly" for
accomodations
Datum: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 00:46:19 +0100
> Gesendet: Samstag, 04. März 2017 um 10:17 Uhr
> Von: "Martin Koppenhoefer"
> An: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools"
> Betreff: Re: [Tagging] how to map simple buildings
>
> So no, the building relations to group building:parts are not strictly
> redundant, but the reason they are "ne
On 04.03.2017 18:05, "Christian Müller" wrote:
Thanks for the examples and conclusion given. This is a strong reason to
demand its usage in wiki docs and IMO we should even suggest their usage
generally, regardless of the construction site's complexity.
Situations complex enough to require typ
> Gesendet: Samstag, 04. März 2017 um 21:21 Uhr
> Von: "Tobias Knerr"
> An: tagging@openstreetmap.org
> Betreff: Re: [Tagging] how to map simple buildings
>
> And probably a few more. None of these requires relations.
I'm sure there is a lot of stuff in OSM where you could
trade code against a re
On 11-Jan-17 12:08 AM, Thilo wrote:
Hello all,
please check this proposal :
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/motorcycle_friendly
Cheers,
Thilo
The proposal is for 'friendly:motorcycle=yes/no/complimentary'.
I have added to its discussion page the following;
1 top of
12 matches
Mail list logo
