Re: [Tagging] how to map simple buildings

2017-03-03 3:36 GMT+01:00 Kevin Kenny : > I'm hijacking the thread a bit here, but the discussion of "bridge > buildings" in Martin's message made me think of this: > > On the campus of GE Research in Niskayuna, New York, there's a fairly > substantial building that is on a bridge across a ravine.

Re: [Tagging] Invalid voting of proposed feature motorcycle_friendly=*

On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 12:50 AM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 03-Mar-17 09:51 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > >> >> sent from a phone >> >> On 2 Mar 2017, at 20:55, Tobias Knerr wrote: >>> >>> While it's ok to overlook minor "rule violations" sometimes, things like >>> not announcin

Re: [Tagging] how to map simple buildings

On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 4:10 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > 2017-03-03 3:36 GMT+01:00 Kevin Kenny : > >> On the campus of GE Research in Niskayuna, New York, there's a fairly >> substantial building that is on a bridge across a ravine. >> > a pointer to the osm object would maybe help to get mor

Re: [Tagging] how to map simple buildings

2017-03-03 14:36 GMT+01:00 Kevin Kenny : > Oops - I thought I'd copied and pasted the link, honest! > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/436809818 > > I'm not yet trying for 2.5d - without topography, that'll give quite odd > results. > you're already doing some 2.5d, the amount of building:level

Re: [Tagging] how to map simple buildings

covered=yes is exactly what I was looking for, thanks! On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 11:21 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > 2017-03-03 14:36 GMT+01:00 Kevin Kenny : > >> Oops - I thought I'd copied and pasted the link, honest! >> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/436809818 >> >> I'm not yet trying fo

Re: [Tagging] how to map simple buildings

On 02.03.2017 17:19, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: do I understand you correctly, we use 1 way (or multipolygon) for every building:part plus 1 multipolygon relation with building=* as a fallback plus 1 type=building relation for every single building? We use one area for every building:part, plus

Re: [Tagging] how to map simple buildings

> Gesendet: Freitag, 03. März 2017 um 03:36 Uhr > Von: "Kevin Kenny" > An: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" > Betreff: Re: [Tagging] how to map simple buildings > > I'm hijacking the thread a bit here You do not, this list is claimed to be open to everyone.   > there's a fairly subs

Re: [Tagging] how to map simple buildings

> Gesendet: Freitag, 03. März 2017 um 20:04 Uhr > Von: "Tobias Knerr" > An: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" > Betreff: Re: [Tagging] how to map simple buildings > > The type=building relation is unnecessary [..] It may be redundant, but it's far from useless. Also, I've noticed tha

Re: [Tagging] Invalid voting of proposed feature motorcycle_friendly=*

On 03-Mar-17 09:21 PM, Paul Johnson wrote: On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 12:50 AM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com > wrote: On 03-Mar-17 09:51 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: sent from a phone On 2 Mar 2017, at 20:55, Tobias Knerr mailto:o...@tob

Re: [Tagging] Invalid voting of proposed feature motorcycle_friendly=*

On 03/03/2017 04:56 PM, Warin wrote: > Would I use friendly:*=no ... yes. There is one pub/fuel stop in > Australia that is 'out of fuel' for motorcyclists ... but has it for cars. > Definitely friendly:motorcycle=no! Very usefull to know that a > motorcycle needs enough fuel to get to the next fue

Re: [Tagging] Invalid voting of proposed feature motorcycle_friendly=*

On 04-Mar-17 09:59 AM, Shawn K. Quinn wrote: On 03/03/2017 04:56 PM, Warin wrote: Would I use friendly:*=no ... yes. There is one pub/fuel stop in Australia that is 'out of fuel' for motorcyclists ... but has it for cars. Definitely friendly:motorcycle=no! Very usefull to know that a motorcycle

Re: [Tagging] Invalid voting of proposed feature motorcycle_friendly=*

I think I'd chime in with the people who are saying that the tag is quite subjective, except that I can think of a few cases where it isn't: http://www.newstimes.com/local/article/For-hikers-no-clean-laundry-in-Kent- 4738977.php#item-38493 in particular comes to mind. But in the absence of signage

[Tagging] proposal: wikipedia_list and wikipedia_section tags

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Wikipedia_tag_types I would like to propose two new tags to distinguish between "There is a Wikipedia page about this object" vs "This object is mentioned in a Wikipedia page". Thanks! ___ Tagging

Re: [Tagging] Invalid voting of proposed feature motorcycle_friendly=*

I agree with Kenny, that's a bit too close to a rating system. If there is a signage, then we should map the signage. I f it's a particular service offered, then we should map the service. I'm particularly interested in kids friendly restaurants, and wonder if I'll pass a rainy weekend mappi