[2017-02-04 18:56] Joachim
>
> A carport is distinctive enough from building=garage and building=roof
> so that an own tag should be used. [...]
> The key building=* is used since a carport is a type
> of building=roof.
Funny how you first try to set the carport apart from the roof and
then, when
Hi.
To be consistent with the approved and already used tags
amenity=animal_breeding [1], amenity=animal_shelter [2] and
amenity=animal_boarding [3], what do you think about:
amenity=animal_breeding
animal_breeding:feedlot=cow OR
animal_breeding:concentrated_animal_feeding_operation=cow
It als
sent from a phone
> On 7 Feb 2017, at 15:41, Viking wrote:
>
> To be consistent with the approved and already used tags
> amenity=animal_breeding [1], amenity=animal_shelter [2] and
> amenity=animal_boarding [3], what do you think about:
>
> amenity=animal_breeding
> animal_breeding:feedlot
Hi everyone,
Recently I found that JOSM uses different tags for notary offices than I'm used
to. Turns out, there are two competing tagging schemas:
* office=lawyer + lawyer=notary: introduced in wiki in 2010, number of uses
gradually rises to ~1000.
* office=notary: introduced by accident in 2
2017-02-07 17:19 GMT+01:00 Ilya Zverev :
> * office=lawyer + lawyer=notary: introduced in wiki in 2010, number of
> uses gradually rises to ~1000.
> * office=notary: introduced by accident in 2014, was scarcely used until
> it has found its way into JOSM presets in late 2015. After that it has
> r
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> to me office=notary seems ok as a tag, I'd prefer it over the office=lawyer +
> subtag tagging, they are sufficiently distinct, and I see no point in
> implying they are a subclass of lawyers which they might be or not. Office is
> a tag that is already finegrained (
2017-02-07 15:32 GMT+01:00 markus schnalke :
> building=residential and building=house have the same tagging
> structure although one is the super class of the other.
>
yes, they are both describing a building typology, but on different detail
level. We have a very flat hierarchy in the building
2017-02-07 18:01 GMT+01:00 Ilya Zverev :
> My point is, it is growing faster not because it is good, but because it
> is in the JOSM presets. Mappers who chose it didn't think twice about which
> tags JOSM places on the objects.
yes, I can understand your frustration because apparently the make
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 7:41 AM, Viking wrote:
> Hi.
> To be consistent with the approved and already used tags
> amenity=animal_breeding [1], amenity=animal_shelter [2] and
> amenity=animal_boarding [3], what do you think about:
>
> amenity=animal_breeding
> animal_breeding:feedlot=cow OR animal_
On 2/7/17 12:13 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
> yes, I can understand your frustration because apparently the makers
> of JOSM have hijacked the notaries and the numbers of "their" tag are
> now growing quite fast, due to the prevalence of JOSM. ;-)
>
> Please, take a step back and look at both
On 2017-02-07 18:56, Richard Welty wrote:
> office=notary just seems wrong to me, they're
> rarely standalone in my experience.
Richard, in Europe they are almost always standalone, by definition.
They need to be independent and impartial "by law". They have a
protected role in many transactions
On 2/7/17 2:21 PM, Colin Smale wrote:
>
> On 2017-02-07 18:56, Richard Welty wrote:
>
>> office=notary just seems wrong to me, they're
>> rarely standalone in my experience.
>>
> Richard, in Europe they are almost always standalone, by definition.
> They need to be independent and impartial "by law
sent from a phone
> On 7 Feb 2017, at 18:56, Richard Welty wrote:
>
> office=notary just seems wrong to me, they're
> rarely standalone in my experience.
this tag is about a standalone notary, if you don't have such a feature you
don't use it. Notaries working in other structures would prob
Also, a lot of businesses serve as notaries, as a side-business. The
closest notary public to my house is a company that rents out private
mailboxes and sells shipping supplies. I have had several documents
notarized there.
On 02/07/2017 01:28 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
On 2/7/17 2:21 PM, Coli
A breeding station is where animals are mated. This isn't normally done
at a feedlot. Also, the generic term is "cattle", since you could also
have heifers (young female cattle), bulls (adult male cattle), steers
(castrated adult male cattle), or bullocks (young male cattle), in
addition to c
Animal_breeding was discussed and voted here [1]
Martin, even you approved that proposal, you are the second voter! Didn't you
remember? :-)
It was also discussed on tagging mailing list here [2]
189 tags are not few for a type of structure that almost nobody maps.
Man_made=cowshed doesn't exist
And the stated intention of those tags was for pets ... not a farming situation.
On 08-Feb-17 08:20 AM, Viking wrote:
Animal_breeding was discussed and voted here [1]
Martin, even you approved that proposal, you are the second voter! Didn't you
remember? :-)
It was also discussed on tagging ma
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 2:20 PM, Viking wrote:
> Animal_breeding was discussed and voted here [1]
>
Nevertheless, in my opinion, it is not appropriate in this application
because the purpose of a feedlot is not to breed the animals, but rather to
fatten them for market.
___
@Mike
1) Ok, cow is the female only: then bovine would be better? Cattle in English
is a term used for bovines only or for other species too?
2) The intention of animal_breeding page was to descibe facilities were animals
grow up, there wasn't a distinction between reproduction and fattening. May
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 3:01 PM, Viking wrote:
> @Mike
> 1) Ok, cow is the female only: then bovine would be better? Cattle in
> English is a term used for bovines only or for other species too?
>
"cattle" is the correct term[1]. I was mistaken in my original email,
"bovine" is a broader term th
sent from a phone
> On 7 Feb 2017, at 22:20, Viking wrote:
>
> Animal_breeding was discussed and voted here [1]
> Martin, even you approved that proposal, you are the second voter! Didn't you
> remember? :-)
I didn't remember, sorry.
actually, the proposal is ok, it just is a different fea
Hi,
A question came up on the Australian list that would be more appropriate
here.
"My local area (and I'm sure many others) have lots of pipeline reserves.
I'm really not sure how to tag these. They appear to have
public access for walking at least. (One local one has a sign
disal
Hi,
One mapper has taken on themselves to 'harmonise' some local source tag
values.
There are many more that could be done along the same lines .. the major
example would be Bing, bing, BING, bing and bing mm (where
is the numerical year and mm is the numerical month).
The
Is there any reason to use a source tag now that comments are required on
commits/edits?
On February 7, 2017 5:47:46 PM PST, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>
>One mapper has taken on themselves to 'harmonise' some local source tag
>
>values.
>
>
>There are many more that could be d
Not really. Although such a move appeals to my sense of orderliness and my
background in database design. All these weird variations in tag values
drive me a little bit crazy but normalizing them is a lot of work that will
soon be undermined by people using new free-form source tags anyhow. By the
There is already a tagging structure for pipelines that takes into account
whether it's underground or overground. See
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8964252
for a section of the Trans Alaska Pipeline. However, the land area above
the pipeline, which is restricted for casual access throughout A
Hi,One interest to do it may be to reduce the volume of the database by improving compression, improve indexing of the values, simplify queries by reducing the need for a request to handle variations of case in a value, simplify statistics by reducing post-analysis... for me there is an added val
That tags the pipe line itself.
The request is to tag the area set aside for a pipe line ... a reserve.
On 08-Feb-17 04:38 PM, Dave Swarthout wrote:
There is already a tagging structure for pipelines that takes into
account whether it's underground or overground. See
http://www.openstreetma
Hi Warin,
Do you have pictures of such areas plz ?
I don't see anything corresponding to 'reserve'
All the best
Le 8 févr. 2017 08:24, "Warin" <61sundow...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> That tags the pipe line itself.
>
> The request is to tag the area set aside for a pipe line ... a reserve.
>
>
>
>
29 matches
Mail list logo
