On 06-11-16 02:30, Mark Wagner wrote:
On Sat, 5 Nov 2016 16:42:47 +0100
Tijmen Stam wrote:
On 03-11-16 11:55, Yves wrote:
@Tijmen, IMHO there is very little chance to convince people to
change the way we tag highways because of buses using them or not.
Yves
This saddens me, because I don't
On 19-10-16 13:34, Simon Poole wrote:
Yes that seems to be a thing (see
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walking_bus and
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedibus).
We've locally (CH) received a question as to how to map such routes and
there doesn't seem to be any established tagging outside of using
I think the key is...is it official? Is it a timetable? Is it a place you
can sign it? If is not an official thing, and it is discretional to some
parents (one day yes, one day no, we don't accept such kids...) , to some
schools...I think OSM is not the place. But if that has the support of
governm
sent from a phone
> Il giorno 27 ott 2016, alle ore 01:24, Dave F
> ha scritto:
>
> Not true. It makes sense wherever you are. Official:name allows a rendering
> of official names of that country & individual 'names:*=' allows rendering
> for specific languages.
+1 (it's actually "officia
I moved this proposal to "proposed" state. Please comment.
A specific tag for vehicles racetracks
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/leisure%
3Dracetrack
Lorenzo
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openst
Am 02.11.2016 um 22:57 schrieb Tijmen Stam:
On 02-11-16 20:27, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
careful with access=no, I suggest to use vehicle=no in this case,
because you risk of excluding pedestrians (and other means of
transport you didn't think about) as well (happened around here in
the rea
Thank you all, this thread caused me to notice my nearest mass-transit
station hadn't been re-mapped since it was rebuilt !
Fix uploaded.
On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 4:47 PM, Bill Ricker wrote:
> Re Access=no inadvertently excluding pedestrians : signage here is
> $300 fine for unauthorized vehicles
