Re: [Tagging] Cenotaph WAS Re: Tagging memorial sites

2016-09-20 Thread Steve Doerr
On 19/09/2016 23:36, Kevin Kenny wrote: In what way is it not a cenotaph? It is clearly a structural monument. It is in memory of a deceased person. Said deceased person is not entombed there, although his remains are thought to be in an unmarked grave somewhere nearby. It looks like a tomb,

Re: [Tagging] Use of oneway=yes on waterways

2016-09-20 Thread David Marchal
Note that, although exceptional, some waterways can flow both ways, according to tidal, floods, if a connected estavelle is absorbing or discharging water... Even if it is unlikely, this tag could be of some use to highlight the fact that the waterway is not subject to such stream variations. F

Re: [Tagging] Cenotaph WAS Re: Tagging memorial sites

2016-09-20 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > Il giorno 20 set 2016, alle ore 08:59, Steve Doerr > ha scritto: > > And the word actually *means* 'empty tomb': 'ancient Greek κενοτάϕιον < κενός > empty [...] + τάϕος tomb' (Oxford English Dictionary). +1, I have added the tomb=cenotaph tag to the proposal: http://wi

Re: [Tagging] Use of oneway=yes on waterways

2016-09-20 Thread Aun Johnsen
In the rare cases of waterways flow in both directions due to tidal forces or other phenomenon, it is highly unlikely these are one way, and if so, most likely conditional. Besides conditional regulations of navigation is often (though not always) regulated by a signal station or a traffic cont

Re: [Tagging] Cenotaph WAS Re: Tagging memorial sites

2016-09-20 Thread Kevin Kenny
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 2:59 AM, Steve Doerr wrote: > And the word actually *means* 'empty tomb': 'ancient Greek *κενοτάϕιον* < > *κενός* empty [...] + *τάϕος* tomb' (Oxford English Dictionary). > > > I became familiar with the word because of my family's history. Two of my great-grandfathers we

Re: [Tagging] Routing in Liège (consulting Michelin)

2016-09-20 Thread André Pirard
On 2016-09-17 20:46, Richard Fairhurst wrote: > André Pirard wrote: >> Last point is what source:???=Michelin ??? to use to prevent a >> StijnRR or like arbitrarily destructing well thought out tagging >> without notifying the author. I suggest >> source:highway=https://viamichelin.be/web/Cartes-

Re: [Tagging] Cenotaph WAS Re: Tagging memorial sites

2016-09-20 Thread Warin
On 20-Sep-16 06:30 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: sent from a phone Il giorno 20 set 2016, alle ore 08:59, Steve Doerr mailto:doerr.step...@gmail.com>> ha scritto: And the word actually *means* 'empty tomb': 'ancient Greek /κενοτάϕιον/ < /κενός/ empty [...] + /τάϕος/ tomb' (Oxford English

Re: [Tagging] Cenotaph WAS Re: Tagging memorial sites

2016-09-20 Thread Kevin Kenny
Be as pedantic as you please. I'll be happy to tag a cenotaph or three if a consensus ever emerges. On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 7:34 PM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 20-Sep-16 06:30 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > > > sent from a phone > > Il giorno 20 set 2016, alle ore 08:59, Steve

Re: [Tagging] Cenotaph WAS Re: Tagging memorial sites

2016-09-20 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2016-09-21 2:41 GMT+02:00 Kevin Kenny : > Be as pedantic as you please. I'll be happy to tag a cenotaph or three if > a consensus ever emerges. just use any tag you feel appropriate. If there will ever be a consensus that tomb=cenotaph is a bad tag and a better tag is chosen, you can easily cha

Re: [Tagging] Routing in Liège (consulting Michelin)

2016-09-20 Thread joost schouppe
André, This isn't about you - this is about project integrity. One lawsuit for copyright infringement could be enough to kill the project. Or we could get our data users into serious problems. Whether or not you are an excellent mapper is not the question. It is just not something we can take chan