I can only tell you how I would do it with the current scheme. If some day
in a very distant future we'll have routes built up from segments, there
might be a better way then.
2016-08-03 8:55 GMT+02:00 Michael Tsang :
> Dear all,
>
> How should I fill in the ref=* tag for public transport routes
> I can only tell you how I would do it with the current scheme. If some day
> in a very distant future we'll have routes built up from segments, there
> might be a better way then.
>
> 2016-08-03 8:55 GMT+02:00 Michael Tsang :
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> How should I fill in the ref=* tag for public tran
[2016-08-03 00:27] Tor
>
> Really? By removing the quick and easy way to tag pavements,
> people will suddenly start mapping pavements?
Thanks for pointing on this. I much agree. If in our rural region we
would start to map sidewalks (which we have not done so far, apart from
some experiments), w
Martijn,
On 08/03/2016 12:09 AM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
> The fact that this is all pretty German language centered sums it all
> up. The topic has perhaps been discussed over and over in your language,
> spoken by ~ 1.4% of the world.
I'm sure if anyone had written a few lines somewhere ("hey
sent from a phone
> Il giorno 03 ago 2016, alle ore 00:09, Martijn van Exel ha
> scritto:
>
> The fact that this is all pretty German language centered sums it all up. The
> topic has perhaps been discussed over and over in your language, spoken by ~
> 1.4% of the world.
maybe this numbe
On 8/1/2016 3:11 PM, Philip Barnes wrote:
The first problem I see is that mapping sidewalks as a separate way
should not be done unless there is a physical separation. For a
pedestrian the sidewalk is a part of the road.
It depends. Both ways are used, and they both have advantages and
disadva
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 5:49 AM, markus schnalke wrote:
>
> So, if mapping sidewalks is a lot of effort (kerbs and such), there
> will be few motivation to do it at all. Having it as trivial as
> possible increases the probability of users doing it.
>
> I tested out the proposed mapping/tagging sc
[2016-08-03 19:35] Mike Thompson
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 5:49 AM, markus schnalke wrote:
>
> So, if mapping sidewalks is a lot of effort (kerbs and such), there
> will be few motivation to do it at all. Having it as trivial as
> possible increases the probability of users doing it.
We try to reload database available for official osm-carto deployment
(which is needed for rendering some additional features and refining
some other):
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/1504
but it appears we don't know how should we treat leisure=track: is it a
linea
On 8/4/2016 3:42 PM, Daniel Koć wrote:
but it appears we don't know how should we treat leisure=track: is it
a linear object or maybe kind of area?
I have seen it both ways.
As a simple way it is a linear object similar to a road.
As a relation - with inner and outer ways .. you now 'know'
sent from a phone
> Il giorno 03 ago 2016, alle ore 23:57, Paul Norman ha
> scritto:
>
> Except in those situations, it's not worth the additional complexity of
> editing
how do you represent a bollard on a sidewalk if it's just an attribute on the
street?
cheers,
Martin
__
11 matches
Mail list logo
