I think the general concencus is that waterway=fairway is a useful tag.
I'll just add it to the wiki so people will know about it.
I'm also going to change the waterway=lake to waterway=fairway where I
come across it and think it should be changed.
Regards,
Maarten
it appears there is already this tag in use, which might cover part of what
you are after:
monitoring:water_level
Cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Colin Smale writes:
> If you need explicit permission, it's access=private, even if there are
> loads of people with that explicit permission.
The notion that all places that need permission are equivalent is
technically true in a non-useful way.
> To gain access to private property, you have
sent from a phone
Il giorno 20 lug 2016, alle ore 15:06, Greg Troxel ha scritto:
>> To gain access to private property, you have to ask the landowner (or
>> their agent). If you want to cross my back yard, you can't - it's
>> private. But I can give you explicit permission.
>
> You have said
sent from a phone
> Il giorno 20 lug 2016, alle ore 15:06, Greg Troxel ha
> scritto:
>
> There
> are many shopping malls near me, and the ways have no access tags.
> That's wrong, as they aren't public rights of way. But it is amazingly
> rare, almost unheard of, to be told not to be there a
Martin Koppenhoefer writes:
> sent from a phone
>
>> Il giorno 20 lug 2016, alle ore 15:06, Greg Troxel ha
>> scritto:
>>
>> There
>> are many shopping malls near me, and the ways have no access tags.
>> That's wrong, as they aren't public rights of way. But it is amazingly
>> rare, almost u
Oops, accidentally sent this from the wrong mailbox again.
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 9:06 AM, Greg Troxel wrote:
>
> Also, we aren't being consistent with such a strict definition. There
> are many shopping malls near me, and the ways have no access tags.
> That's wrong, as they aren't public rig
Kevin Kenny wrote:
> I just want to be able to look at my map and answer the
> quick question, "is there red tape that I have to plan for
> before I plan a trip here?"
Yep. I asked a similar question at
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2016-February/028504.html
but there was no
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 1:43 PM, Richard Fairhurst
wrote:
> Yep. I asked a similar question at
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2016-February/028504.html
> but there was no particular consensus.
>
> access=permit seems to have moderate usage (slightly more than =license,
> whic
Hi,
There is an abandoned proposal about tagging hollow ways [1]. How does one
go about reviving it?
Reviving abandoned proposals in general does not seem to be explained in
the wiki [2] (but I'm not the best at reading doc). I would want to adapt
the proposal with the input from the discussion.
We have a somewhat similar problem in Belgium: a lot of historical paths
are by law open to everyone, however they are private property. So the road
is private, but the access is not. It would then not make sense to put an
access=private tag, as the owner has no right to allow or restrict access.
H
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 7:07 PM, Dave Swarthout
wrote:
>
> I posted this on the Garmin OSM forum but nobody responded. Maybe someone
> here can help with this.
>
> I recently added maxspeed to many highways in my neighborhood and am
> looking for a way to have them display on my Garmin Montana. Mo
12 matches
Mail list logo
