Re: [Tagging] New tag

2016-06-30 Thread Steve Doerr
On 30/06/2016 05:27, Hans De Kryger wrote: How does everyone feel about (store_number=) for store numbers that companies assign their stores? Or perhaps branch_number? -- Steve --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus ___

Re: [Tagging] New tag

2016-06-30 Thread Andrew Errington
ref=* would be better, as it's already understood by a lot of other tools and renderers. Andrew On 30 Jun 2016 16:28, "Steve Doerr" wrote: > On 30/06/2016 05:27, Hans De Kryger wrote: > > How does everyone feel about (store_number=) for store numbers that > companies assign their stores? > > > O

Re: [Tagging] New tag

2016-06-30 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2016-06-30 9:42 GMT+02:00 Andrew Errington : > ref=* would be better, as it's already understood by a lot of other tools > and renderers. +1, also, ref is already referring to a number, so ref:store:num seems unneccessarily complicated, so even if you should opt for a more structured tag than "

Re: [Tagging] New tag

2016-06-30 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2016-06-30 9:51 GMT+02:00 Martin Koppenhoefer : > ref=* and shop=* -- 10567 > ref:shop:num -- 121 > ref:shop --2 > and branch_ref -- 7 https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/branch_ref#overview Cheers, Martin ___ Tag

Re: [Tagging] New tag

2016-06-30 Thread Colin Smale
On 2016-06-30 09:51, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > If you put a ref on a shop it is clear that the ref refers to the shop. If it > isn't clear where the ref refers to (e.g. a building, another business or > amenity etc.) there is something wrong with the mapping and it combines > several objects

Re: [Tagging] New tag

2016-06-30 Thread Hans De Kryger
I apologize, i meant i would use (ref:shop=) just realized that. Read the tag as (ref:shop=number) But you guys have just won me over with your point of views. Will use (ref=) in my project, thanks! Regards, Hans Regards, Hans On Jun 30, 2016 12:59 AM, "Martin Koppenhoefer" wrote: > > 2016-06

Re: [Tagging] New tag

2016-06-30 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2016-06-30 10:23 GMT+02:00 Colin Smale : > Are you suggesting that a shop object which is coterminous with a building > outline should get its own polygon, sharing nodes between the two? you could do it like this, but I'd rather use a multipolygon relation to avoid overlapping ways. Some people

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - learner driver

2016-06-30 Thread Michael Tsang
On Wednesday 29 June 2016 16:55:08 jeffrey.rho...@geogr.uni-giessen.de wrote: > > So even countries that have some kind of learner license don't necessarily > have any restrictions on roads concerning them, hence I think the tag as a > general tag would be problematic, since it could cause confusi

Re: [Tagging] New tag

2016-06-30 Thread Paul Johnson
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 11:27 PM, Hans De Kryger wrote: > How does everyone feel about (store_number=) for store numbers that > companies assign their stores? > I generally use ref=* for the store number. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - learner driver

2016-06-30 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2016-06-30 11:03 GMT+02:00 Michael Tsang : > I live in Hong Kong and the legal framework is below: > > The learner licence is legally required for a learner to learn to drive on > the > road (because driving without a licence is an offence). Once a learner has > got > the learner licence, he can l