sent from a phone
> Il giorno 09 giu 2016, alle ore 18:41, Greg Troxel ha
> scritto:
>
> Perhaps there should be some more explicit tagging to denote
> uncertainty. But drawing a polygon around the buildings that are part
> of the settlement, and including areas that if a new building were b
sent from a phone
> Il giorno 09 giu 2016, alle ore 18:50, Christoph Hormann
> ha scritto:
>
> If you can verifiably map a settlement as a linear way you can also map
> it as an area. Usually neither is the case so most populated places
> are mapped as nodes.
I think that most settlemen
sent from a phone
> Il giorno 09 giu 2016, alle ore 23:43, Amacri ha scritto:
>
> A polygon provides additional specifications than a line and implies
> knowledge of surface information that an historical map could not document
> itself and that a mapper shall not arbitrarily add.
this boils
sent from a phone
> Il giorno 09 giu 2016, alle ore 21:53, JIDB
> ha scritto:
>
>
> Kneipp facilities (de) are popular in german speaking countries. But
> currently it is only possible to tag single foot basins (using
> amenity=kneipp_water_cure).
>
did you consider changing the namespa
On Thursday 09 June 2016, Amacri wrote:
> > On a general note - when things are mapped as nodes this is
> > frequently done with the implicit notion that this is a location
> > with a certain tolerance margin. You might think of mapping
> > something with a linear way as a method to specify an ani
Martin Koppenhoefer writes:
(This is just a longer note about non-admin-boundary settlements and why
they are particularly tricky in a lot of New England, sort of separate
From the node/line/way discussion.)
>> Il giorno 09 giu 2016, alle ore 18:50, Christoph Hormann
>> ha scritto:
>>
>> If
On 10/06/16 at 10:46am, Greg Troxel wrote:
>
> Martin Koppenhoefer writes:
>
> (This is just a longer note about non-admin-boundary settlements and why
> they are particularly tricky in a lot of New England, sort of separate
> From the node/line/way discussion.)
>
> >> Il giorno 09 giu 2016, al
penstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:healthcare
cheers
Martin
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20160610/d3966c3d/attachment-0001.html>
--
_
I'm seeing a number of turn lane tagging fixes referencing
http://osmlab.github.io/to-fix/#/admin/invalidturnlanes and making fixes
such as
before:
lanes=4
oneway=yes
turn:lanes =left|through|through;right
after:
lanes=4
oneway=yes
left|||
The wiki at http://wiki.openstr
Hey Mikel,
can you send the exact place where did you find the change?
We are working fixing the invalid turn lanes.
Thanks,
Ruben
2016-06-10 16:00 GMT-05:00 Mike N :
>
> I'm seeing a number of turn lane tagging fixes referencing
> http://osmlab.github.io/to-fix/#/admin/invalidturnlanes and ma
This is on the way http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/316565385
On 6/10/2016 5:18 PM, Rubén López Mendoza wrote:
Hey Mikel,
can you send the exact place where did you find the change?
We are working fixing the invalid turn lanes.
Thanks,
Ruben
2016-06-10 16:00 GMT-05:00 Mike N mailto:nice...@
I honestly think Mapbox needs to stop immediately editing ways that they think
are invalid. I've seen several ways that I've work hard on, know are valid,
and are being damaged by edits. The 'NONE' tag in turn lanes is COMPLETELY
VALID
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/rickmastfan67/diar
Hi Mike
We are working in a big effort to add turnlanes in 30 cities in USA,
https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/issues/180, and fix the invalid turn
lanes is part of this project.
That was a mistake, it was made using the satellite image , but we know the
local knowledge is more important, we've
Hey James,
(Disclaimer: I work for Mapbox, but I am not part of the team that is doing
the lane tagging, and can’t speak for them).
I do need to know more about your concern: Is `none` as part of a multiple
turn lane option documented anywhere?
I’m asking because we are adding turn lane ta
I haven’t seen “none;slight_right” as a value and am not sure how that should
look different than “slight_right” by itself. However “none” is a value listed
in the wiki [1] and I use it a lot as I find multiple vertical bars hard to
manually count/edit but I can see and count things like “left|n
I've been using the "turn:lanes:*=none;slight_right" & "slight_left;none" tags
to indicate which side a new lane has been added on a highway when going from 1
to 2 lanes (sometimes "slight_left;slight_right" if the original lane is
centered between the two new lanes). How else are people to pro
Thanks James for the explanation, it does make sense now. I hope I wasn’t the
only person confused to see that tag..
I appreciate all the work that you’ve put into adding lane details OSM. My
goal is to make lane tagging easy for everyone.
That said, I think you might be the only person in
I must admit I have never seen none;slight_right in any of the lane tagging.
None is only used in cases where there are no arrows on the ground for
that particular lane. Furthermore empty is also not a valid value.
Empty is only valid in e.g. maxspeed:lanes to indicate that the lane
has the default
18 matches
Mail list logo
