On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 8:48 AM, Шишкин Александр (Shishkin Ale
wrote:
> I assume that tags related to education that have been approved and do not
> have "education" key should remain (not sure what to do with unapproved
> tags).
I cannot advise on that. Not everybody is giving the same weight t
Well, then we need a more precise definition on the wiki. It is confusing to
have "probably very similar to..." and "duplicate of...".
You admit that "the meaning of these terms varies widely depending on who you
ask and which country you're mapping": this is against the interpretation and
usabi
sent from a phone
> Am 13.04.2016 um 21:15 schrieb Marc Gemis :
>
> - ISCED (level) http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/ISCED
> does it fit somewhere in the scheme ? I think the British community
> used this tag during their quarterly school mapping project.
just for complet
On 14/04/2016 00:28, anarcat wrote:
boat_supplies was*never* mentionned in this thread prior to this post,
It was, but somebody broke the thread. The subsequent discussions
continued in both fragments. If you view this list in thread view, the
separated fragment is immediately after this one
Well, I (or anyone else) can not just force mappers to use or not to use
certain tags. Only way to deal with it is to give them better way to tag
things. That's what this proposal is about.
2016-04-14 10:06 GMT+03:00 Marc Gemis :
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 8:48 AM, Шишкин Александр (Shishkin Ale
>
but then you should clearly explain why 5 "complex" tags for a driving
school is better than 1.
And in case you do not really need them all five, the proposal should
better indicate the required tags for a driving school and the
optional ones. I think "education_system:de_standard=yes",
"education_
