Re: [Tagging] tagging sport=shotput or sport=shot_put?

2016-03-29 Thread Marc Gemis
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 3:33 AM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Good, one thing we agree on. > > Yay. I note 'we' are the only two participants. Such is voluntary democracy. > Anyone else want to give some support one way of the other?? It started out as a question on spelling for a tag:

Re: [Tagging] tagging sport=shotput or sport=shot_put?

2016-03-29 Thread Shawn K. Quinn
On Sun, 2016-03-27 at 13:24 +0200, Tom Pfeifer wrote: > Yes and for good reason. Soccer and American Football are comnpletly > different sports, > and have completely different pitches. Yes, they are completely different sports, but I've seen the same physical field re-painted for soccer when foot

Re: [Tagging] Tagging natural or historic regions

2016-03-29 Thread althio
Others gave opinions, I agree with a lot of statements. So let me give a round of personnal agreement (+1's) to these: > Personally I would prefer an approximate polygon to a node. > I don't like boundary=informal though. It should be something more verbose > regarding what kind of region this

Re: [Tagging] tagging sport=shotput or sport=shot_put?

2016-03-29 Thread Warin
On 29/03/2016 7:21 PM, Shawn K. Quinn wrote: On Sun, 2016-03-27 at 13:24 +0200, Tom Pfeifer wrote: Yes and for good reason. Soccer and American Football are comnpletly different sports, and have completely different pitches. Yes, they are completely different sports, but I've seen the same phys