Hi,
I have come across a parade ground for Police - thus not military ...
There are a few instances of military=parade_ground ... but this is not
military..
Would landuse=parade_ground be suitable.. or is there any other idea?
___
Tagging mailing li
sent from a phone
> Am 26.03.2016 um 08:40 schrieb Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>:
>
> Would landuse=parade_ground be suitable.. or is there any other idea?
can you describe a bit more what this looks like, and how it is exactly used?
Is this a piece of city where parades will occasionally ta
I wonder what others think about changing the status of proposals in draft mode
to abandoned in the wiki. Is this something we want everyone to do after a
certain time, or should this be reserved to the original proponent?
Would the situation be different if the status wasn't draft but proposed?
On Sat, 26 Mar 2016 11:06:34 +0100
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> I wonder what others think about changing the status of proposals in
> draft mode to abandoned in the wiki. Is this something we want
> everyone to do after a certain time, or should this be reserved to
> the original proponent? Woul
sent from a phone
> Am 26.03.2016 um 11:49 schrieb Mateusz Konieczny :
>
> "what would be a reasonable threshold" - no edits in this or previous
> year is my typical method to recognise something on internet as dead.
but wouldn't it be necessary to look at actual map edits rather than on a wi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi Alan,
Am 25.03.2016 um 23:54 schrieb Alan McConchie:
> I’d like to solicit comments on the following proposal, to create a
> new tag called "highway=social_path"
>
> Wiki page is here:
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Soci
Alan McConchie wrote:
> Some commenters have suggested using the existing highway=path tag,
> with supplemental tags such as access=no or informal=yes, or a new
> supplemental tag path=social_trail, or adding an operator tag. However,
> these supplemental tags are too easily ignored by data cons
On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 06:17:52AM -0700, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
> Alan McConchie wrote:
>
> access=no is absolutely a core tag within OSM, dating back to the very first
> iteration of Map Features. It isn't "easily ignored". Any router which
> ignores it is unambiguously bugged. Any renderer in
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote on 2016/03/26 12:49:
Am 26.03.2016 um 11:49 schrieb Mateusz Konieczny :
"what would be a reasonable threshold" - no edits in this or previous
year is my typical method to recognise something on internet as dead.
but wouldn't it be necessary to look at actual map edits
The status should in some way make it clear to people who use the wiki
as a tagging reference whether the contents of the page should be taken
into account or not. If the proposal has been "abandoned" but what is
suggests has nonetheless entered wider usage, then it is de facto
accepted by the comm
Colin Smale wrote on 2016/03/26 15:45:
The status should in some way make it clear to people who use the wiki as a tagging
reference whether the contents of the page should be taken into account or not. If the
proposal has been "abandoned" but what is suggests has nonetheless entered wider
usag
The qualifier service=parking_aisle was originally introduced [1] to
structure car parks with a few main access ways and lots of small aisles,
to avoid clutter in lower zoom levels.
It is highly successful with over 2 Mio uses.
The description says that, however "The main way(s) on the parking l
sent from a phone
> Am 26.03.2016 um 17:15 schrieb Tom Pfeifer :
>
> Thus I would like to use a different qualifier for those ways entering
> the lot and connecting the aisles, e.g. service=parking_access.
>
> This does not break any consumer, is not used so far (ok, once, exactly for
> the pu
Gets my vote.
On 2016-03-26 17:15, Tom Pfeifer wrote:
> The qualifier service=parking_aisle was originally introduced [1 [1]] to
> structure car parks with a few main access ways and lots of small aisles,
> to avoid clutter in lower zoom levels.
>
> It is highly successful with over 2 Mio uses.
Am 26.03.2016 um 17:15 schrieb Tom Pfeifer :
Thus I would like to use a different qualifier for those ways entering
the lot and connecting the aisles, e.g. service=parking_access.
This does not break any consumer, is not used so far (ok, once, exactly for
the purpose), and also solves a recent q
Hello, there.
I'm wondering: there are tons of natural features that have been modified or
organized by humans, like springs which emerge in man-made ponds. Is there a
tag used to model this organization, like organised=yes?
Awaiting your answers,
Regards.
On 26/03/2016 7:48 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
sent from a phone
Am 26.03.2016 um 08:40 schrieb Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>:
Would landuse=parade_ground be suitable.. or is there any other idea?
can you describe a bit more what this looks like, and how it is exactly used?
Is this a pi
Tom Pfeifer writes:
> The qualifier service=parking_aisle was originally introduced [1] to
> structure car parks with a few main access ways and lots of small aisles,
> to avoid clutter in lower zoom levels.
>
> It is highly successful with over 2 Mio uses.
>
> The description says that, however
> On Mar 26, 2016, at 4:56 PM, Greg Troxel wrote:
>
>
> Tom Pfeifer writes:
>
>> The qualifier service=parking_aisle was originally introduced [1] to
>> structure car parks with a few main access ways and lots of small aisles,
>> to avoid clutter in lower zoom levels.
>>
>> It is highly succ
19 matches
Mail list logo
