Warin wrote on 2016/03/25 05:11:
Hi,
Both sport=shotput and sport=shot_put exist in the data base with about the
same numbers .. about 50 each.
I thing I prefer the sport=shot_put as that reflects wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shot_put
I prefer to tag all those as sport=athletics, a
On 18 March 2016 at 22:15, Michael Reichert wrote:
> I agree that an importance tag for mountains is not a suitable concept
> but a importance tag for train stations (or airports) is surveyable and
> suitable for OSM. Just take the timetable or go out and stay one day on
> the platforms, count an
On 20 March 2016 at 00:12, Alexander Matheisen
wrote:
> If you have a look at the highway=* tagging: This scheme is subjective,
> but there is no alternative.
Poppycock.
> As the person who created that station importance draft, I will focus
> on stations, but for other features like mountain p
On 21 March 2016 at 22:26, Daniel Koć wrote:
> Using Wikidata as a base for peaks scoring is worse than basing it on
> population, because it's less universal and relies on one particular
> website, but I don't reject it at this moment.
Actually, counting the links to other Wikimedia sites from
Am Freitag, den 25.03.2016, 11:26 + schrieb Andy Mabbett:
> On 20 March 2016 at 00:12, Alexander Matheisen
> wrote:
>
> > If you have a look at the highway=* tagging: This scheme is
> > subjective,
> > but there is no alternative.
>
> Poppycock.
Why?
> > As the person who created that stat
Am Freitag, den 25.03.2016, 11:20 + schrieb Andy Mabbett:
> On 18 March 2016 at 22:15, Michael Reichert wrote:
>
> > I agree that an importance tag for mountains is not a suitable
> > concept
> > but a importance tag for train stations (or airports) is surveyable
> > and
> > suitable for OSM.
Am Montag, den 21.03.2016, 23:26 +0100 schrieb Daniel Koć:
> Interesting idea worth testing, IMO. However I suspect in practice
> there
> will be lot of problems to make it really fly.
>
> Let's look at the similar simple idea (with scoring based on city
> type
> and population) used to render c
On 25 March 2016 at 12:19, Alexander Matheisen
wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 25.03.2016, 11:26 + schrieb Andy Mabbett:
>> On 20 March 2016 at 00:12, Alexander Matheisen
>> wrote:
>>
>> > If you have a look at the highway=* tagging: This scheme is
>> > subjective,
>> > but there is no alternative.
Am Freitag, den 25.03.2016, 16:36 + schrieb Andy Mabbett:
> On 25 March 2016 at 12:19, Alexander Matheisen
> wrote:
> > Am Freitag, den 25.03.2016, 11:26 + schrieb Andy Mabbett:
> > > On 20 March 2016 at 00:12, Alexander Matheisen
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > If you have a look at the high
sent from a phone
> Am 25.03.2016 um 13:29 schrieb Alexander Matheisen
> :
>
> And the German version of this article (you can translate it with
> Google Translator) says that a secondary road often corresponds to a
> certrain legal designation, but it does not have to.
although this is a pe
On 25/03/2016 9:16 PM, Tom Pfeifer wrote:
Warin wrote on 2016/03/25 05:11:
Hi,
Both sport=shotput and sport=shot_put exist in the data base with
about the same numbers .. about 50 each.
I thing I prefer the sport=shot_put as that reflects wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shot_put
I p
Dear tagging list,
I’d like to solicit comments on the following proposal, to create a new tag
called "highway=social_path"
Wiki page is here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Social_path
Definition from the wiki page:
We propose the "social_path" value to mark so-called
Alan McConchie writes:
> Some commenters have suggested using the existing highway=path tag,
> with supplemental tags such as access=no or informal=yes, or a new
> supplemental tag path=social_trail, or adding an operator
> tag. However, these supplemental tags are too easily ignored by data
> c
Warin wrote on 2016/03/25 23:07:
On 25/03/2016 9:16 PM, Tom Pfeifer wrote:
Warin wrote on 2016/03/25 05:11:
I thing I prefer the sport=shot_put as that reflects wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shot_put
I prefer to tag all those as sport=athletics, as well as the tracks for
long-jump
sent from a phone
> Am 25.03.2016 um 23:54 schrieb Alan McConchie :
>
> We propose the "social_path" value to mark so-called social trails (also
> known as bootleg trails or desire lines): game trails, detours, or short-cuts
> that have seen sufficient pedestrian use that they appear to be hi
On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 15:54:31 -0700
Alan McConchie wrote:
> Note: As an experiment, we tagged 17 features in Marin County,
> California, as highway=social_path, but these have subsequently been
> re-tagged as highway=path, access=no
Well, highway=path, access=no is covering case of paths illegal
16 matches
Mail list logo
