In my hometown the "transfer station" is located at the landfill. Trucks
carrying garbage arrive there and transfer their loads to the landfill. In
any case, tagging those is not the point of this thread. It's the
automotive salvage yard, or junkyard, that I was looking to tag. So, are we
in reason
Hello, there.
I've got a tagging problem here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/48.34992/6.15965 A side stream of the
Madon river runs in a culvert under the private track, and that makes a glitch
by rendering the culvert over the `natural=water/water=river` polygon. I asked
on the renderi
Re-sent message, the first one being misformatted.
> From: chris_horm...@gmx.de
> To: tagging@openstreetmap.org
> Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 22:37:07 +0100
> Subject: Re: [Tagging] wetland=bog, why only "receive their water and
> nutrients from rainfall"?
>
> On Saturday 23 January 2016, David Mar
> Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2016 15:59:24 +
> From: ajt1...@gmail.com
> To: tagging@openstreetmap.org; tagging@openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [Tagging] wetland=bog, why only "receive their water and
> nutrients from rainfall"?
>
> What does "fen" means to y
Damn Hotmail!
> From: chris_horm...@gmx.de
> To: tagging@openstreetmap.org
> Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 22:37:07 +0100
> Subject: Re: [Tagging] wetland=bog, why only "receive their water and
> nutrients from rainfall"?
>
> On Saturday 23 January 2016, David Ma
Because there some comments about the "removing", please mind this line
of the proposal:
what this proposal wants to do if successful
- add a text to Key:name that discourages from using this tags, even if
they exist in database. A link to this proposal will explain the reasons.
so of course, I w
2016-01-25 11:42 GMT+01:00 David Marchal :
> I've got a tagging problem here:
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/48.34992/6.15965 A side stream of
> the Madon river runs in a culvert under the private track, and that makes a
> glitch by rendering the culvert over the `natural=water/water=rive
2016-01-25 12:05 GMT+01:00 Hakuch :
> Because there some comments about the "removing", please mind this line
> of the proposal:
>
> what this proposal wants to do if successful
> - add a text to Key:name that discourages from using this tags, even if
> they exist in database. A link to this propo
On 25.01.2016 12:10, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> 2016-01-25 12:05 GMT+01:00 Hakuch :
>
>> Because there some comments about the "removing", please mind this line
>> of the proposal:
>>
>> what this proposal wants to do if successful
>> - add a text to Key:name that discourages from using this tag
> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 12:06:22 +0100
> From: dieterdre...@gmail.com
> can you please post a link to the object you think is rendered wrong, not to
> the part of the map, e.g. like this:
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/350320686
> This is a track, it should likely get a layer tag and a brid
On 25/01/2016 13:40, David Marchal wrote:
... it isn't a bridge, ...
Would 2 separate riverbank polygons, separated by the culvert, perhaps
by more "correct" here?
Cheers,
Andy
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.ope
Perhaps a width tag could be helpful in this situation.
Dominic
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 9:09 AM Andy Townsend wrote:
> On 25/01/2016 13:40, David Marchal wrote:
>
> ... it isn't a bridge, ...
>
>
> Would 2 separate riverbank polygons, separated by the culvert, perhaps by
> more "correct" here?
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 5:40 AM, David Marchal wrote:
> No, I'm aware of the problem for way 343507824, I just didn't correct it
> yet. The problem is for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/355739433 : it
> isn't a bridge, it's basically a parallelepipedic concrete block with
> culverts below to a
On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 14:40:26 +0100
David Marchal wrote:
> > Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 12:06:22 +0100
> > From: dieterdre...@gmail.com
> > can you please post a link to the object you think is rendered
> > wrong, not to the part of the map, e.g. like this:
> > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/350320
Dear all,
The proposal for aquatics centre has been rejected:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Aquatics_centre
The proposal received 17 approving votes, and 28 opposing votes (38%
support). I would like to thank everybody for voting.
From the comments, it follows that there i
Dear all,
The proposal to discourage amenity=swimming_pool has been approved:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Discourage_amenity%3Dswimming_pool
The proposal received 36 approving votes, and 5 opposing votes (88%
support). I would like to thank everybody for voting.
I also o
Dear all,
Recently, amenity=swimming_pool has been officially marked as
discouraged. In addition, a vote was carried out to propose a tag for
swimming pools that are used for sport or swimming lessons. This vote
was rejected, but from the comments of the voters,
leisure=sports_centre + sport=swimm
Hi all,
The tag shop=jewelry is one of the few tags that use American rather
than British English. The previous discussion seemed to indicate that
people have strong opinions on this topic, but that there is no strong
consensus either way.
I have therefore created a proposal page for the tag shop
Hi all,
The wiki defines the tag tourism=gallery as 'an area or typically a
building that displays a variety of visual art exhibitions' [1]. This
is an officially approved tag [2]. In addition, the wiki page on
tourism=museum [3] specifies that art galleries should be tagged as
tourism=gallery, ev
Hi,
the German word "Galerie" is often used for art showrooms where you
can actually buy the stuff on display. (I know a couple that are not
larger than a typical hairdresser's.) Hence I wouldn't be surprised if
many of the 415 tourism=gallery features in Germany were such
establishments. They'
Hi all,
I have created a proposal to use the tag office=government for the
tagging of government offices. The proposal also replaces/discourages
a number of tags, amongst which is amenity=public_building.
The proposal can be found here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Governm
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 2:44 PM, Matthijs Melissen wrote:
> The wiki defines the tag tourism=gallery as 'an area or typically a
> building that displays a variety of visual art exhibitions' [1]. This
> is an officially approved tag [2]. In addition, the wiki page on
> tourism=museum [3] specifies
On 26 January 2016 at 00:08, Frederik Ramm wrote:
>the German word "Galerie" is often used for art showrooms where you
> can actually buy the stuff on display. (I know a couple that are not
> larger than a typical hairdresser's.)
Note that we have shop=art for such places, which is about 4 ti
23 matches
Mail list logo
