sent from a phone
> Am 17.01.2016 um 02:51 schrieb Tijmen Stam :
>
> I am an Atheïst and wasn't brought up in a religious way, and also lack
> knowledge thereof. However, I feel that a pilgrimage is a longer route where
> the travel itself is what makes one contemplate. There is not one route
Javbw
> On Jan 17, 2016, at 5:44 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
>
> I am an Atheïst
I am as well, but work at a Buddhist school, and visit historic places in Japan
which are almost always religious in nature, so I have heard a bit.
One note to pass on here:
Depending on the situatio
2016-01-17 2:51 GMT+01:00 Tijmen Stam :
> My proposal route=worship is a route (usually short) with fixed places
> where one should worship.
>
> In short, I feel that a (for example) station of the cross and a
> pilgrimage are entirely diffent things.
>
for reference, I have once mapped one of t
hi
On 10.01.2016 22:29, moltonel 3x Combo wrote:
> * Spliting by semicolons (no regexp needed :p) is easy but naive,
> because semicolons are sometimes part of the actual value.
that should be only in a very little cases, do you know any? Anyway, it
is possible to happen, yes, but if we start to i
just mentioning that there is another discussion thread for this topic
on the list:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Please-don-t-think-name-1-tags-are-errors-td5864875.html
On 10.01.2016 22:29, moltonel 3x Combo wrote:
> On 9 January 2016 at 18:50, Hakuch wrote:
>> I propose, to remove the taggin
Tijmen Stam wrote on 2016/01/17 00:56:
Dear All,
I am sending this RFC in order to receive some feedback regarding my OSM
feature proposal for route=worship.
I'd prefer to keep the value of 'route' restrained to the mode of locomotion,
not its purpose. Thus keep them route=hiking (66734), rou
Hi
On 15.01.2016 18:03, moltonel 3x Combo wrote:
> Changing the topic a little bit, I'd like to comment on alt_name vs
> name_1 va alt_name_1. To me name_1 and alt_name are exact synonyms, I
> don't see a semantic difference (as opposed to loc_name for example).
> Therefore, if you've only got two
Hi
On 15.01.2016 23:01, Dave F. wrote:
> On 15/01/2016 16:25, Ralph Aytoun wrote:
>> I object to the continuous use of naming new mappers as a problem.
>
> Are you sure it's not the design of the editor that's being called out
> as the culprit?
I join this view, Iam not considering the people wh
