Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Aquatics centre

2015-12-29 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > Am 29.12.2015 um 00:25 schrieb johnw : > > Perhaps more detail on the court.. because having sport:1=foo sport:2=bar > or sport=foo;bar devolves into endless permutations - both in the data and > discussions. the attribute solution is sport:basketball=yes/dedicated...

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Aquatics centre

2015-12-29 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > Am 29.12.2015 um 00:09 schrieb Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>: > > Much rather have sports_centre=athletics;ball_sports ... combinations using > ';' ... I know some don't like that .. but it makes the detail of what > 'multi' actually is. I agree that the well establishe

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Aquatics centre

2015-12-29 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > Am 26.12.2015 um 22:21 schrieb John Willis : > > Obviously the private facilities are landuse commercial (they are a company). it is not obvious (e.g. all retail facilities are companies as well, but are tagged with landuse=retail). Frankly, landuse tagging is not working

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Aquatics centre

2015-12-29 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > Am 26.12.2015 um 22:21 schrieb John Willis : > > - but so many of the aquatics centers are going to be part of larger public > facilities like recreation centers or other civic complexes. > > Another good example why we need a government/civic/something landuse(s). no,

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Aquatics centre

2015-12-29 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > Am 29.12.2015 um 10:43 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer : > > New Urbanism, a conservative retro movement of which besides other the Prince > of Wales is a big fan, and which being more than 30 years old isn't quite > "new" any more) sorry, wanted to write "reactionary" ;-)