Re: [Tagging] new access value

2015-10-09 Thread Friedrich Volkmann
On 09.10.2015 08:30, Marc Gemis wrote: > You didn't read my complete mail then. I wrote that it would be better to > use something like access:destination:traffic_sign=... > because I realised that traffic_sign on a road would be a bad idea. With access:destination:traffic_sign=* you get the same

Re: [Tagging] new access value

2015-10-09 Thread Richard Fairhurst
Friedrich Volkmann wrote: > I don't care how many countries are affected. It's a distinctive meaning, > so it deserves a distinctive tag. I get really angry whenever people > write "I oppose that tag because I don't need it in my country." Indeed. However, localised meaning does not always hav

Re: [Tagging] waterway=penstock to complete pipeline tagging

2015-10-09 Thread Bryce Nesbitt
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 4:41 AM, François Lacombe wrote: > > Currently, I find something missing regarding man_made=pipeline + > substance=water because a pipe carrying water can correspond to many > things in reality. > man_made=pipeline + substance=water + *waterway=penstock* would fill the > lac

Re: [Tagging] waterway=penstock to complete pipeline tagging

2015-10-09 Thread François Lacombe
Hi everyone, 2015-10-07 1:02 GMT+02:00 Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>: > > I'd like to think anything carrying waste water (sewer) would have a non > permeable lining.. and that lining could be called a 'pipe' and thus it is a > 'pipeline'. > > To me the 'tubes' in my house for carrying water/gas a

Re: [Tagging] waterway=penstock to complete pipeline tagging

2015-10-09 Thread Colin Smale
I see a pipeline as analogous to a route, i.e. from one place to another, made up of many contiguous segments of varying types. Many of these segments may be (steel) pipes, but they may also be drilled through rock or whatever. A penstock is a particular function of certain pipelines, for exampl

[Tagging] Conditional restriction: oneway

2015-10-09 Thread Wolfgang Hinsch
Hi, there is a contradiction in the wiki, In paragraph "Restriction type" there is a link to oneway=* while in paragraph "Direction" is wirtten "... use forward and backward ..." . oneway=* has the values yes|-1|no|reversible onewa

Re: [Tagging] waterway=penstock to complete pipeline tagging

2015-10-09 Thread François Lacombe
According to this wikipedia article : NYC Water supply https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_City_water_supply_system I see many terms to talk about Catskill Aqueduct which is a major part of this system : aquduct, conduit, tunnel, siphon... but pipeline is never used. Google tells nothing about

Re: [Tagging] waterway=penstock to complete pipeline tagging

2015-10-09 Thread Colin Smale
Why can a drilled rock tunnel, or an aqueduct for that matter, not be part of a pipeline? Are you just saying it is unlikely, or do you mean that it would no longer be called a pipeline if part of its distance is drilled through rock instead of being a steel pipe? According to this article that

Re: [Tagging] new access value

2015-10-09 Thread Friedrich Volkmann
On 09.10.2015 13:39, Richard Fairhurst wrote: > localised meaning does not always have to be parsed into universal > tags. > > Here in the UK we have very specific access legislation for paths. On a > bridleway, for example, cycling is permitted, but cycle racing is forbidden, > and cannot be auth

Re: [Tagging] new access value

2015-10-09 Thread Friedrich Volkmann
On 08.10.2015 12:16, Lauri Kytömaa wrote: (...a lot. I try to narrow it down to the critical passages.) > sometimes the signs restrict the > traffic by "who", not by destination. I.e. in the Anreinerverkehr case, > [...] it's no longer about the destination, but which > group of people you, or the

Re: [Tagging] new access value

2015-10-09 Thread ajt1...@gmail.com
On 09/10/2015 19:54, Friedrich Volkmann wrote: On 09.10.2015 13:39, Richard Fairhurst wrote: localised meaning does not always have to be parsed into universal tags. Here in the UK we have very specific access legislation for paths. On a bridleway, for example, cycling is permitted, but cycle

Re: [Tagging] new access value

2015-10-09 Thread Richard Fairhurst
Friedrich Volkmann wrote: > Contribute something useful, or get a life. Please retract that insult, and agree not to post such comments in the future, or you will be removed from this list. Thank you. Richard tagging@ list admin -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com

Re: [Tagging] new access value

2015-10-09 Thread Friedrich Volkmann
On 09.10.2015 23:44, Richard Fairhurst wrote: > Friedrich Volkmann wrote: >> Contribute something useful, or get a life. > > Please retract that insult, and agree not to post such comments in the > future, or you will be removed from this list. What insult? Do you mean me or him? He offended me b

Re: [Tagging] new access value

2015-10-09 Thread Friedrich Volkmann
On 09.10.2015 23:42, ajt1...@gmail.com wrote: >>> localised meaning does not always have to be parsed into universal >>> tags. >>> >>> Here in the UK we have very specific access legislation for paths. On a >>> bridleway, for example, cycling is permitted, but cycle racing is forbidden, >>> and can