W dniu 03.08.2015 11:59, Tom Pfeifer napisał(a):
christian.pietz...@googlemail.com wrote on 2015-08-03 09:20:
landcover=trees has it's origins in this proposal:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/landcover
The proposal wanted to seperate the phsyical landscape (landcover)
from
Anybody other have problems with posts to the list getting lost? I
resend this one and hope this time it will get there:
Wiadomość oryginalna
Temat: Re: [Tagging] landcover=trees definition
Data: 10.08.2015 11:35
Od: Daniel Koć
Do: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
On 03/08/2015 09:20, christian.pietz...@googlemail.com wrote:
landcover=trees has it's origins in this proposal:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/landcover
The proposal wanted to seperate the phsyical landscape (landcover)
from the cultural landscape (landuse). But the propos
I received your original message at 11:35. (UTC+02:00)
On Monday 10 August 2015 11:56:27 Daniel Koć wrote:
> Anybody other have problems with posts to the list getting lost? I
> resend this one and hope this time it will get there:
--
Ruben Maes
The field "from" of an email is about as reliab
W dniu 10.08.2015 12:29, Jean-Marc Liotier napisał(a):
To me, it seems that mapping this area as a combination of
landuse=residential and landcover=grass would be most fitting. I have
thought about using the landuse=residential + natural=grass
combination instead, but those lawns do not strike m
Jean-Marc Liotier wrote:
> landuse=residential + natural=grass combination
> instead, but those lawns do not strike me as natural.
The grass is natural (plants), unless it's some sort of man made
plastic artificial grass imitation). The key natural never was only
about geographical features, nor w
W dniu 10.08.2015 13:38, Ruben Maes napisał(a):
I received your original message at 11:35. (UTC+02:00)
I didn't and I have also seen no trace of it in the archive for at least
20 minutes.
In general I get them almost instantly and the archive shows them fast
too, but once or two my messages
sent from a phone
> Am 10.08.2015 um 11:56 schrieb Daniel Koć :
>
> landcover=garden
to me this is clearly a landuse, in osm typically mapped as leisure=garden
This garden value should be discouraged for landcover
cheers
Martin
___
Tagging maili
On Monday 10 August 2015 13:51:16 Daniel Koć wrote:
> I didn't and I have also seen no trace of it in the archive for at least
> 20 minutes.
Now that I think of it, some messages of mine on other lists have also not been
included in the archives but people responded to them.
> In general I get
For that matter, there can be major regional variations within the same
country, not to mention variations for historical reasons within the same
city. In Nashville, Tennessee, USA, where I live, the majority of the city
was developed post-World-War-II, meaning that residential streets tend to
10 matches
Mail list logo
