Re: [Tagging] works_as_highway=primary

2015-08-02 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > Am 01.08.2015 um 23:18 schrieb John Eldredge : > > It makes sense to me to go more by physical attributes than the official > primary/secondary/tertiary rating I don't understand why we are having this same discussion every 2 years. Please read the wiki for the outcome

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (nutrition_supplements)

2015-08-02 Thread Alberto Chung
___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Paving stone details

2015-08-02 Thread Tobias Knerr
Hi all, my new proposal introduces some subtags for surface=paving_stones. This will hopefully allow mappers who are interested in the topic to add more detail to the relatively broad "paving stones" category, without affecting applications which don't need such detailed information. For the full

[Tagging] highway=footway - Advanced definition: Distinction footway vs path

2015-08-02 Thread geow
I would like to propose an advanced definition of footway in order to have a classification criteria from "path". "highway=footway is used for pathways designated for pedestrians. The designation may be explicitly by a signpost, implicitly by law (like sidewalks if mapped as distinct ways) or obvi

Re: [Tagging] highway=footway - Advanced definition: Distinction footway vs path

2015-08-02 Thread Daniel Koć
W dniu 02.08.2015 21:26, geow napisał(a): I would like to propose an advanced definition of footway in order to have a classification criteria from "path". It would be very useful to have more clear definitions for example to help understand how we should display it on default map style - the

Re: [Tagging] Rendering for shop=boutique/fashion on default style

2015-08-02 Thread John Eldredge
While "boutique" is used most often to refer to small clothing stores, I have also seen the term used to small stores selling other types of goods. I think that additional tagging indicating the type of merchandise sold is a good idea. It seems to be a marketing term implying "small, and using

Re: [Tagging] Telecoms Tagging

2015-08-02 Thread Tim Waters
Many thanks! On 22 July 2015 at 23:12, François Lacombe wrote: > Hi Tim, > > Can you take care of this proposal please ? > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Telecom_local_loop > It intends to setup a model for telecoms local loops using telecoms=* and > man_made=street_cabinet

Re: [Tagging] highway=footway - Advanced definition: Distinction footway vs path

2015-08-02 Thread Richard
On Sun, Aug 02, 2015 at 12:26:24PM -0700, geow wrote: > I would like to propose an advanced definition of footway in order to have a > classification criteria from "path". > > "highway=footway is used for pathways designated for pedestrians. The > designation may be explicitly by a signpost, impli

Re: [Tagging] *** GMX Spamverdacht *** Re: highway=footway - Advanced definition: Distinction footway vs path

2015-08-02 Thread Michael Reichert
Hi Richard, Am 2015-08-02 um 23:25 schrieb Richard: >> Rationale: >> >> The current definition ("minor pathways which are used mainly or exclusively >> by pedestrians") is not specific in providing definite distinctive features >> between footway and path. The consequences are misconceptions and g

Re: [Tagging] Telecoms Tagging

2015-08-02 Thread Ruben Maes
2015-07-23 0:12 GMT+02:00 François Lacombe : > Finally, and regarding mobile telecom networks, there is this chart which > try to illustrate components and relations to be made on a mobile station > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Radio_antennas_mapping_proposal.png Is there a reason for

Re: [Tagging] highway=footway - Advanced definition: Distinction footway vs path

2015-08-02 Thread geow
Richard Z. wrote > ... > I would leave it alone and introduce highway=footpath which would be a > variant > of path for pedestrians, not suited or permitted for horses and vehicles > unless > otherwise tagged and expected to be more demanding than footways. > ... @Richard - I wouldn't even dream

[Tagging] landcover=trees definition

2015-08-02 Thread Daniel Koć
I have just discovered that while landcover=trees has no Wiki page, it's quite established tag (I wouldn't say "popular" here, because it's just about 1% of forest/wood uses) and we could officially define as a generic tag for trees areas, when it's not clear for the mapper if it's natural or n

Re: [Tagging] highway=footway - Advanced definition: Distinction footway vs path

2015-08-02 Thread Ilpo Järvinen
On Sun, 2 Aug 2015, geow wrote: > Richard Z. wrote > > ... > > I would leave it alone and introduce highway=footpath which would be a > > variant > > of path for pedestrians, not suited or permitted for horses and vehicles > > unless > > otherwise tagged and expected to be more demanding than fo

Re: [Tagging] highway=footway - Advanced definition: Distinction footway vs path

2015-08-02 Thread Warin
On 3/08/2015 8:58 AM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote: On Sun, 2 Aug 2015, geow wrote: Richard Z. wrote ... I would leave it alone and introduce highway=footpath which would be a variant of path for pedestrians, not suited or permitted for horses and vehicles unless otherwise tagged and expected to be mor

Re: [Tagging] Telecoms Tagging

2015-08-02 Thread Warin
On 3/08/2015 7:51 AM, Ruben Maes wrote: 2015-07-23 0:12 GMT+02:00 François Lacombe : Finally, and regarding mobile telecom networks, there is this chart which try to illustrate components and relations to be made on a mobile station https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Radio_antennas_mapping

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (nutrition_supplements)

2015-08-02 Thread Warin
On 2/08/2015 9:16 PM, Alberto Chung wrote: The proposal is on the wiki page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/nutrition_supplements And states "Definition: A shop selling vitamins and minerals; food supplements." Does the shop have to sell BOTH vitamins and minerals?