Hi,
> 1)
> Access=student - access designated for students of a school/facility,
> similar to customers of a shop or visitors of a facility. Does not imply
> age or gender, though it is used at mostly at K-12 facilities. For use
> with entrance=* or possibly with certain school amenities (Locker
> On Jun 8, 2015, at 5:50 PM, Dominik George wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> 1)
>> Access=student - access designated for students of a school/facility,
>> similar to customers of a shop or visitors of a facility. Does not imply
>> age or gender, though it is used at mostly at K-12 facilities. For use
>>
Hi,
> I guess I need a solution for the path access too - because
> access=private also seems an incorrect label - or would both be
> covered by access=inder-building ?
just out of curiosity, what would happen if you *did* use it as an
entrance *before* using the main entrance?
-nik
signature
Hi,
quite often there are node-type objects on bridges or in tunnels.
What to do with them? Tunnel or bridge tags are dfined only for
ways.
Richard
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Hi,
> quite often there are node-type objects on bridges or in tunnels.
>
> What to do with them? Tunnel or bridge tags are dfined only for
> ways.
please be a bit more specific on what you mean. Do you mean…
a) … a node on a way that is tagged as tunnel or bridge, or
b) … a node that is itse
On Mon, 8 Jun 2015, Dominik George wrote:
> > quite often there are node-type objects on bridges or in tunnels.
> >
> > What to do with them? Tunnel or bridge tags are dfined only for
> > ways.
>
> please be a bit more specific on what you mean. Do you mean…
>
> a) … a node on a way that is ta
>>> quite often there are node-type objects on bridges or in tunnels.
>>>
>>> What to do with them? Tunnel or bridge tags are dfined only for
>>> ways.
>>
>> please be a bit more specific on what you mean. Do you mean…
>>
>> a) … a node on a way that is tagged as tunnel or bridge, or
>> b) … a no
> On Jun 8, 2015, at 8:05 PM, Dominik George wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> I guess I need a solution for the path access too - because
>> access=private also seems an incorrect label - or would both be
>> covered by access=inder-building ?
>
> just out of curiosity, what would happen if you *did* use it
Hi,
> I hope that helps a bit.
yeah, thanks for the detailed explanation. I learnt a lot about an
exciting foreign culture today!
As for the tagging, there definitely should be something, and on first
glance, I do not see an issue with the access=inter_building idea.
-nik
signature.asc
Desc
> Am 08.06.2015 um 13:29 schrieb Richard :
>
> What to do with them? Tunnel or bridge tags are dfined only for
> ways.
layer tags should match, but I don't see a problem in stating with attributes
for nodes that they are in a tunnel or on a bridge just like we do for ways
cheers
Martin
_
On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 01:57:52PM +0200, Dominik George wrote:
> Ah. You think the OP is talking about *real-world* objects and how to
> tag them. I was thinking they are talking about bugs in the map ;).
yes, I was talking about real world objects that are represented as
nodes in OSM
> In that
Hi,
someone added location=roof to the wiki
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key:location&diff=1083742&oldid=997238
somehow this does not seem to fit well with the other values,
what are the opinions on that?
Richard
___
Tagging mail
On Mon, 8 Jun 2015, Richard wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 01:57:52PM +0200, Dominik George wrote:
>
> > In that case, I believe the layer=* tag should be used instead, giving
> > the object the same layer as the tunnel or bridge.
>
> not such a good solution.
>
> For real-world-node-objects
2015-06-08 14:39 GMT+02:00 Richard :
> someone added location=roof to the wiki
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key:location&diff=1083742&oldid=997238
>
> somehow this does not seem to fit well with the other values,
> what are the opinions on that?
>
can you explain where you
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Driver_and_Vehicle_Licensing_Agency
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Department_of_Motor_Vehicles
amenity=driver_vehicle_licensing_agency
Seems a bit long and while it's the name of the agency in the UK it also
describes what it does very well. Maybe without acency? U
On Mon Jun 8 15:48:01 2015 GMT+0100, Andreas Goss wrote:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Driver_and_Vehicle_Licensing_Agency
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Department_of_Motor_Vehicles
>
> amenity=driver_vehicle_licensing_agency
>
> Seems a bit long and while it's the name of the agency in the U
On Mon, 2015-06-08 at 16:48 +0200, Andreas Goss wrote:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Driver_and_Vehicle_Licensing_Agency
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Department_of_Motor_Vehicles
>
> amenity=driver_vehicle_licensing_agency
>
> Seems a bit long and while it's the name of the agency in the UK
On Mon Jun 8 15:48:01 2015 GMT+0100, Andreas Goss wrote:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Driver_and_Vehicle_Licensing_Agency
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Department_of_Motor_Vehicles
>
> amenity=driver_vehicle_licensing_agency
>
> Seems a bit long and while it's the name of the agency in the U
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 11:08 AM, wrote:
> On Mon Jun 8 15:48:01 2015 GMT+0100, Andreas Goss wrote:
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Driver_and_Vehicle_Licensing_Agency
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Department_of_Motor_Vehicles
>>
>> amenity=driver_vehicle_licensing_agency
I typically use offi
Take a look at this example, the Galata Bridge in Istanbul, Turkey
http://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=galata%20bridge#map=19/41.02271/28.97477
The tunnels under the streets are lined with shops on both sides of a wide
walkway. It's essentially a mall and all of it is underground. I added a
If you want to comment about a message someone else posted, don't simply
quote them without adding any comments of your own. We already know what
they posted. Empty posts can happen by accident, but some participants of
this list are in the habit of posting zero-content "comments" on a daily bas
Maybe something like:
office=licensing
licensing:vehicle=yes
licensing:driver=yes
I fell like long term that tag would completely blow up, considering you
can get a license for almost everything. And this seems to be a very
specific government institution in many countries.
In the US, the
Or amenity=licensing, driver=yes, vehicle=yes.
This could then expand for other things requiring a license, shotgun=yes?
Which I'm not sure is so great as it could expand endlessly. And there
is also stuff like motorsport licenses etc.
I typically use office=government for this sort of thin
> Am 08.06.2015 um 16:48 schrieb Andreas Goss :
>
> Seems a bit long and while it's the name of the agency in the UK it also
> describes what it does very well. Maybe without acency? Using + isn't a good
> idea, right?
>
> amenity=driver_vehicle_licensing
>
> Or is there a more general ter
Am 08.06.2015 um 18:33 schrieb Andreas Goss :
>>> This could then expand for other things requiring a license, shotgun=yes?
>
> Which I'm not sure is so great as it could expand endlessly. And there is
> also stuff like motorsport licenses etc.
+1, and the tagging with shotgun=yes is way t
On 2015-06-08 13:29, Richard wrote :
Hi,
quite often there are node-type objects on bridges or in tunnels.
What to do with them? Tunnel or bridge tags are dfined only for
ways.
In my mind:
bridges are piece of concrete below the roads (tarmac) and
> Am 08.06.2015 um 19:10 schrieb André Pirard :
>
> In my mind:.
level or layer?
Usually you don't have to add layer tags to rivers and streams when they cross
a bridge or a tunnel.
Typically we do not map any bridges or tunnels explicitly but only state that
something else like a roa
I would like to propose that the tag full_service=yes be used to tag
gas stations that are full serve (i.e. an attendant pumps gas, like
all gas stations in New Jersey and Oregon).
The tag self_service=yes is already used for gas stations, but some
gas stations are both self serve and full serve a
On Mon, 2015-06-08 at 13:49 -0400, Andrew MacKinnon wrote:
> I would like to propose that the tag full_service=yes be used to tag
> gas stations that are full serve (i.e. an attendant pumps gas, like
> all gas stations in New Jersey and Oregon).
>
> The tag self_service=yes is already used for gas
> Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2015 15:48:56 +0200
> From: Martin Koppenhoefer
> To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools"
>
> Subject: Re: [Tagging] location=roof ?
> Message-ID:
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> 2015-06-08 14:39 GMT+02:00 Richard :
>
>> someone added
I believe we have a huge gap at tags for government agencies. We could start
drafting a system with subtags, eg
a tag that says a place is a government agency, a subtag for the administration
level (eg municipal, regional, national, could maybe be the same as
admin_level?), more subtags for the
On 08.06.2015 16:48, Andreas Goss wrote:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Driver_and_Vehicle_Licensing_Agency
office=government
name=Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency
short_name=DVLA
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Department_of_Motor_Vehicles
office=government
name=Massachusetts Registry of Mo
These are very specific government agencies. This may be a place where
regionally specific
tags work best. Maybe pretty it up with a namespace.
office=goverment
admin_level=4
office:type:california=DMV
office=goverment
admin_level=4
office:type:massachusetts=RMV
name=Massachusetts
> On Jun 9, 2015, at 3:12 PM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
>
> There's a whole set of assumptions about each type of goverment office that
> would be impossible to
> consistently capture with generic tags. Here the "Duck" of duck typing says
> call it by whatever it is known locally.
>
I think ther
34 matches
Mail list logo
