Re: [Tagging] Way inside riverbank

2015-04-18 Thread Friedrich Volkmann
On 14.04.2015 15:59, moltonel 3x Combo wrote: > Changing topics, I've just stumbled on the wiki on the "natural=water, > water=river" tagging that I wasn't aware of and is supposed to replace > waterway=riverbank. 4 years after being "approved", it still > represents only about 3% of the riverbank

Re: [Tagging] inuse, defacto

2015-04-18 Thread Friedrich Volkmann
>> On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Friedrich Volkmann wrote: >>> I recently came across a never proposed tag with some 600 uses marked >>> "de-facto". If that's the way to bypass the proposal process, I will >>> never care about proposals any more. > > How do you know there was any intent to by

Re: [Tagging] inuse, defacto

2015-04-18 Thread Tobias Knerr
On 18.04.2015 09:31, Friedrich Volkmann wrote: > So far we have 3 parameters: number of OSM objects, number of real-word > objects, number of users. Let's put them into a formula in order to enable > objective decisions and avoid edit wars. I don't think it's as easy as that. Other things to consi

Re: [Tagging] Way inside riverbank

2015-04-18 Thread Tobias Knerr
On 13.04.2015 15:06, Torstein Ingebrigtsen Bø wrote: > I'm currently importing topological data of Norway to OSM. From the data > set we have riverbanks; however, we do not have the deepest middle way > as required by the wiki [1]. As the deepest middle way is hard to identify for regular mappers,

Re: [Tagging] Tagging of pitches within a campsite

2015-04-18 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
> Am 18.04.2015 um 06:31 schrieb Tod Fitch : > > FWIW, on a mountain where I volunteer I mapped the campgrounds with the > tagging shown on the proposed extensions page which uses ref=* instead of > addr:street or addr:unit. I'd also use ref for the number/code. What do you use to say it's

Re: [Tagging] inuse, defacto

2015-04-18 Thread Jan van Bekkum
Why is it important? The main thing that matters is than only one definition exists for an item, irrespective of how often it is used. On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 5:46 PM Tobias Knerr wrote: > On 18.04.2015 09:31, Friedrich Volkmann wrote: > > So far we have 3 parameters: number of OSM objects, numb

Re: [Tagging] Tagging of pitches within a campsite

2015-04-18 Thread Tod Fitch
> On Apr 18, 2015, at 11:02 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer > wrote: > > >> Am 18.04.2015 um 06:31 schrieb Tod Fitch : >> >> FWIW, on a mountain where I volunteer I mapped the campgrounds with the >> tagging shown on the proposed extensions page which uses ref=* instead of >> addr:street or addr:un