>
> But there's no (easy) way to define an address connected to an unnamed road.
> Way numbers
> are not supported for addr:street, afik.
most residential roads are totally unnamed in Japan. Most larger roads have a
number (and a name). motorways (outside Tokyo) have only names.
What we would
On 16.04.2015 06:25, Dave Swarthout wrote:
> But I'd be willing to bet that most trails are not part of a network of
> other trails or a route but are stand-alone. The trails I once hiked in the
> Adirondack Mountains in New York State all have names and trailheads but,
> with a couple of exception
On 2015-04-17 07:39, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
If you entered Pinnacles Campground Site 12 into your OSM powered GPS,
would you not be happy if it took you all the way to Site 12?
In practice that would also require:
addr:housenumber=12
addr:street=[unnamed service road]
They are not re
Please also see at
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Extend_camp_site#Tagging_of_individual_pitches
Sorry that I can't comment on the area originally linked to but I am currently
in the mountains with only a mobile phone and a lousy connection so I am having
difficulty seeing
As you all know, Template:Proposal_Page (used in proposals) has another set
of statuses than Template:ValueDescription (used in feature pages).
The latter defines:
inuse: the feature is in use
defacto: the tag is in widespread use, but no formal proposal process has
taken place
Now that's quite a
On April 17, 2015 3:40:41 AM PDT, Craig Wallace wrote:
>On 2015-04-17 07:39, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
>>
>> If you entered Pinnacles Campground Site 12 into your OSM powered
>GPS,
>> would you not be happy if it took you all the way to Site 12?
Yes, but I don't think addr:housenumber is the way to
It will be hard to come up with a number to distinguish between the two. As
others have pointed out on this mailing list before, the actual number of
items that can be tagged with a certain tag matters.
So in case there are only 600 items in the whole world of that "thing", it
is de-facto. If there
On 17/04/2015, Marc Gemis wrote:
> It will be hard to come up with a number to distinguish between the two. As
> others have pointed out on this mailing list before, the actual number of
> items that can be tagged with a certain tag matters.
> So in case there are only 600 items in the whole world
On 17/04/2015 14:38, moltonel 3x Combo wrote:
A more useful metric is how many different contributors used the tag.
Is anyone aware of any analysis of who (or how many users) first used
particular tags, or who (or how many users) "accepted" a tag by making a
subsequent change to an object?
On 15.04.2015 11:54, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> People put building=* on any structure
>
> +1, and I am fine with it, just wanted to comment on "not all tanks are
> buildings" and point out that in OSM all structures are "buildings".
Bridges? Masts? Fences? Rails? Flagpoles? Power lines?
> Am 17.04.2015 um 17:40 schrieb Friedrich Volkmann :
>
> Bridges? Masts? Fences? Rails? Flagpoles? Power lines?
>
> Maybe everything that looks like a building, smells like a building and
> behaves like a building, but not all structures.
bridges yes, the others not, see here for a long li
On Apr 17, 2015 1:41 AM, "Bryce Nesbitt" wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 9:50 PM, David Bannon
wrote:
>>
>>
>> That scheme seems to rely on house number model. Sure looks good.
>>
>> But does it, by implication, indicate there is a (eg) a house number 12
>> on the unnamed service road ? I
On Apr 16, 2015 6:06 AM, "Nelson A. de Oliveira" wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 7:41 AM, Richard Z. wrote:
> > not all of the dams are man_made, beavers are busy builders.
>
> I want to be the first one tagging a beaver_made=dam :-)
Did I just find another furry?
On Apr 14, 2015 2:10 AM, "Volker Schmidt" wrote:
>
>
>
>
>>
>> How would you tag:
>
>
> Here are my reformulated answers.
> Note that the answers do not apply to all countries, and most certainly
not to the US, where to my knowledge there are no distinctions between
bicycle and pedestrian use of s
FWIW, on a mountain where I volunteer I mapped the campgrounds with the tagging
shown on the proposed extensions page which uses ref=* instead of addr:street
or addr:unit.
I have also generated paper maps off that OSM data. Local fire people saw one
and were impressed and asked for a copy. Ende
Folks, to revisit a topic that had lots of discussion last month !
I have updated the proposal page for camp_site=[basic; standard;
serviced; delux].
I now avoid the question of how to tag multiple instances of (eg)
amenity on the one node, area. People seem to have strong but
conflicting views a
16 matches
Mail list logo
