Hi!
I just stumbled upon this page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Vehicle_types
What is this page? A proposal or a should it be a complete list of vehicle
types? Anyone ever heard about the tag "automobile"? Or "animal_drawn"?
In my opinion this page should either be updated or - better -
According to the history from September 2007
"New page: ==Proposal== A standard list of abbreviations for vehicle types,
to be used in any tagging schemes whose value changes depending on the
vehicle used to visit them ==Examples== * access:.."
+1 on deleting it
regards
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at
I like the proposal, and would vote for it.
uto, 31. ožu 2015. 00:55 Richard Z. je napisao:
>
> I have lifted the scheme originally proposed by Mike to
> a proposal page, did not have time for details yet.
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Volcanic_features
>
> Richard
>
>
2015-03-31 0:37 GMT+02:00 Daniel Koć :
>
> OSM was started as a middle-scale map of a big European city, hence:
>
> 1. Highways were meant to be just crossing lines from GPS (=just routing
> and macro-to-middle-scale rendering).
>
+1, and this hasn't changed. area:highway is a completely differe
2015-03-31 9:40 GMT+02:00 Marc Gemis :
> +1 on deleting it
+1, seems the access page is documenting better what we do use.
Cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
2015-03-31 8:08 GMT+02:00 Dave Swarthout :
> amenity=toilets;drinking_water
> fee=no
> opening_hours=24/7
> toilets:position=seated;urinal
>
> Yes, good information. There is much ambiguity in that example if the
> tagging is not done carefully and properly.
+1, often mappers use semikolon sepa
2015-03-30 18:58 GMT+02:00 Bryce Nesbitt :
> At a first level approximation, a volcano is a peak. Even on the caldera
> rim there's still a high point, and that's the peak
yes, but the natural=volcano page states that you shouldn't use this peak
point, you should rather "Place [the node] as cl
2015-03-31 0:14 GMT+02:00 John Willis :
> while some of them are iconic cones,(Fuji), and some are shields which are
> very flat (Vesuvius),
sorry for picking this, because I am aware this was not the main content of
your message, still as living personally in relative proximity to the
Vesuvius
Nominatim heavily uses the Wikipedia tag to decide which search result to
put in front. So if you write "Paris" in the search box, Paris, Texas is
not going to be the first result. They look at the length of the article,
number of translated articles, or something like that. I see no reason
rendere
W dniu 31.03.2015 10:18, Martin Koppenhoefer napisał(a):
I have for long been promoting a clearer approach for this kind of
mess, and I agree that there would be need to implement some changes.
While my propositions are much more than this (I'd like to fix more
fundamental issues), I'm happy
I wonder that nobody so far did spell out a warning about adding
information from websites. The simple key website=* is ok, but every
information like address, prizes and all the amenities is most of the
time not usable due to license problems.
cu fly
I'm pushing this offtopic and this discussi
2015-03-31 12:51 GMT+01:00 Andrew Guertin :
>> I wonder that nobody so far did spell out a warning about adding
>> information from websites. The simple key website=* is ok, but every
>> information like address, prizes and all the amenities is most of the
>> time not usable due to license problems
On Mar 31, 2015 4:55 AM, "Andrew Guertin" wrote:
>>
>> I wonder that nobody so far did spell out a warning about adding
>> information from websites. The simple key website=* is ok, but every
>> information like address, prizes and all the amenities is most of the
>> time not usable due to license
+1 for deleting
(thanks, Martin V, for the replay on the lanes business)
Volker
On 31 March 2015 at 10:19, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
> 2015-03-31 9:40 GMT+02:00 Marc Gemis :
>
>> +1 on deleting it
>
>
>
>
> +1, seems the access page is documenting better what we do use.
>
> Cheers,
> Martin
>
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 6:55 AM, Jan van Bekkum wrote:
Not sure about the typo : is it "non-designated" or "non_designated" ?
Pieren
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
having a second look at it -
geological=volcanic_lava_channel — way — lava flowing in a defined direction
for wide lava channels it would be usefull to define the shape
somehow?
Richard
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://l
Am 31.03.2015 um 13:59 schrieb Dan S:
> 2015-03-31 12:51 GMT+01:00 Andrew Guertin :
>>> I wonder that nobody so far did spell out a warning about adding
>>> information from websites. The simple key website=* is ok, but every
>>> information like address, prizes and all the amenities is most of the
Corrected where applicable
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 3:33 PM Pieren wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 6:55 AM, Jan van Bekkum
> wrote:
>
>
> Not sure about the typo : is it "non-designated" or "non_designated" ?
>
> Pieren
>
> ___
> Tagging mailing list
Does any formal definition of a postfix to a key exist?
A prefix in prefix:key like in abandoned:shop tells something about the
state for the key.
In a proposal like camp_site:restaurant=yes it means that restaurant
belongs to camping (a kind of site relation in a line).
In practice in this exam
W dniu 31.03.2015 11:22, Janko Mihelić napisał(a):
Nominatim heavily uses the Wikipedia tag to decide which search result
to put in front. So if you write "Paris" in the search box, Paris,
Texas is not going to be the first result. They look at the length of
the article, number of translated arti
> Am 31.03.2015 um 12:52 schrieb Daniel Koć :
>
> So we have a simple hierarchy:
>
> landuse (implies)=> landcover
no, it doesn't imply
>
> but you have to know there is a "use" at all to tag it as "landuse". Since
> the trees may not be used (like in natural=wood), your statement is fa
Among other reasons, a managed forest, if it stops being actively managed, will
gradually revert over time into a wild woodland, as other species start moving
back in.
On March 31, 2015 5:16:10 PM CDT, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
>
>
>
> > Am 31.03.2015 um 12:52 schrieb Daniel Koć :
> >
Mt Fuji is a very special volcano. I should have used another example, but
everyone knows Fuji as a "cone".
Fuji is a stratovolcano on top of a shield volcano, hence the similar sloping
sides at the bottom. However, the cone from the halfway point is much steeper.
Pic from halfway up. Most of t
Hi,
I have taken this back to the Draft status/stage.
There is not much of a change to the basic proposal amenity=reception_desk.
There is a much more verbose explanation of things .. like what key to use.
Summary of voting ..
Thank you all for voting. 38 votes is I hope a good representation
We have the landmark tag - maybe natural=volcano/peak + landmark gets it’s own
rendering terms?
There is the “hundred mountains of Japan” list - and 3 mountains in my
prefecture are also considered “the three mountains of Gunma” - Akagi is on
both. Would that let me claim it is not subjectively
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Daniel Koć wrote:
> Generally speaking they can, of course, but in case of default osm-carto
> rendering there's no chance currently, since Andy is totally opposed to any
> subjective measures:
> However if we can find some - more or less - objective features, they
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 1:40 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
> +1, often mappers use semikolon separated lists on the same object for what
> should actually be more than one object (in cases where a main tag has
> multiple values). This is not working. But it is normally no problem to use
> multiva
I labelled the page now for deletion.
Thanks for your comments.
br,
Martin
2015-03-31 15:26 GMT+02:00 Volker Schmidt :
> +1 for deleting
> On 31 March 2015 at 10:19, Martin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
> 2015-03-31 9:40 GMT+02:00 Marc Gemis :
>
>> +1 on deleting it
>
> +1, seems the access page is d
28 matches
Mail list logo
