Re: [Tagging] Change of rendering: place of worship and, terminal without building tag

2015-02-15 Thread SomeoneElse
On 15/02/2015 01:24, Warin wrote: What 'landuse' would you say it is? It does not fit in any of the values given on the wiki http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:landuse There are over 2,900 tagged landuse=religious currently. as shown by the taginfo. You can't always take taginfo numbe

Re: [Tagging] Change of rendering: place of worship and, terminal without building tag

2015-02-15 Thread Tom Pfeifer
SomeoneElse wrote on 2015-02-15 10:52: You can't always take taginfo numbers at face value. right. let's look closer. For example, in the UK much of the usage of "landuse=religious" was introduced by this changeset: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/25035328 14 I have counted in this

Re: [Tagging] Change of rendering: place of worship and, terminal without building tag

2015-02-15 Thread SomeoneElse
On 15/02/2015 11:17, Tom Pfeifer wrote: I find that landuse=churchyard vs. landuse=religious+religion=christian have the same meaning, with the advantage that the latter works multicultural. No. If you read back up through this and previous threads, you'll see that "landuse=religious" simp

Re: [Tagging] Change of rendering: place of worship and, terminal without building tag

2015-02-15 Thread John Willis
Landuse=religious is a generic version of churchyard. I can think of several large church complexes in California - a massive Mormon temple, a Presbyterian church ground a with a small preschool, a couple Catholic Churches, a Jehovah's Witness hall, a big mega-church hall, a cult-like church t

[Tagging] high mobile masts on man_made=mast

2015-02-15 Thread Mihkel Rämmel
Does anyone have objections to adding a second picture of mobile mast to man_made=mast on wiki and clarifying that masts can be higher than 'only a few meters'. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Mobile_communications_mast.JPG Mihkel ___ Tagging

Re: [Tagging] high mobile masts on man_made=mast

2015-02-15 Thread Clifford Snow
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 11:56 AM, Mihkel Rämmel wrote: > Does anyone have objections to adding a second picture of mobile mast > to man_made=mast on wiki and clarifying that masts can be higher than > 'only a few meters'. > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Mobile_communications_mast.JPG

Re: [Tagging] high mobile masts on man_made=mast

2015-02-15 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
> Am 15.02.2015 um 21:25 schrieb Clifford Snow : > > I've been taught that a mast is usually not self supporting, ie. has guy > wires while a tower is self supporting. +1 cheers, Martin ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https:/

Re: [Tagging] high mobile masts on man_made=mast

2015-02-15 Thread Dave Swarthout
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 4:23 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > I've been taught that a mast is usually not self supporting, ie. has guy > wires while a tower is self supporting. +1 Also, the wiki definition needs changing IMO. Maybe they meant to say, a few meters in diameter. -- Dave Swar

[Tagging] Bus route relations. Forward/backward tag

2015-02-15 Thread Hans De Kryger
Me and a fellow mapper are adding bus routes to are city and are confused about ​ the Forward/backward tag you use on relations. I think I'm using it right yet every time i check ​ÖPNVKarte, it shows the route going the opposite way in which i intended. Just looking for any help i can get. I'm quit

Re: [Tagging] Bus route relations. Forward/backward tag

2015-02-15 Thread Jo
On the one hand I'm not adding roles to the ways in PT routes relations anymore, instead I add all the ways in the correct order. Some ways are included twice. But if you prefer to add them, you have to know forward/backward relates to the direction of the way itself. If it follows the arrow: forw