Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - temperature

On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 9:04 PM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > > A hotel room that has air conditioning may be both heated or cooled > depending on the desired temperature and the ambient temperature (and the > air conditioner). It usually supplies a measure of fresh air too. I think > tha

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - temperature

On 12/02/2015 3:45 AM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote: On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 9:04 PM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com > wrote: A hotel room that has air conditioning may be both heated or cooled depending on the desired temperature and the ambient temperature (and

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - temperature

On 11 February 2015 at 17:45, Bryce Nesbitt wrote: > On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 9:04 PM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> A hotel room that has air conditioning may be both heated or cooled >> depending on the desired temperature and the ambient temperature (and the >> air conditioner). It

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - temperature

Hi all, I wonder: shouldn't we separate a conditioned room air in a hotel and an object temperature? I get the feeling that this discussion on a useful tag (how to denote the temperature of an object where it is needed) is slowly drifting away to defining about everything related to temperature.

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Voting system- time for reform?

On 2/02/2015 4:34 AM, Paul Johnson wrote: On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 8:00 AM, Dave Swarthout mailto:daveswarth...@gmail.com>> wrote: +1 "Nobody votes because it's a borderline pointless endeavor." Yep. Thus things don't get approved due to lack of votes because few vote. And few vote becaus

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - temperature

On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > Why do you consider heated and cooled an 'interesting characteristic' > and how do you see it being rendered on to a map? Is it more > 'important/significant' than the suggested temperature values? If so .. why > has it not b

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - temperature

On February 11, 2015 3:59:45 PM CST, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 12/02/2015 3:45 AM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote: > Most air conditioners here have the ability to both heat and cool at > least here and in the UK. Technically, a unit that can either cool a building, or heat it by cooling ou

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - temperature

On 12/02/2015 9:57 AM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote: On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com > wrote: Why do you consider heated and cooled an 'interesting characteristic' and how do you see it being rendered on to a map? Is it more 'import

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - temperature

On 12/02/2015 10:25 AM, John F. Eldredge wrote: On February 11, 2015 3:59:45 PM CST, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: On 12/02/2015 3:45 AM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote: Most air conditioners here have the ability to both heat and cool at least here and in the UK. Technically, a unit that can eithe

Re: [Tagging] Nominatim mysteries

Hi, The OSM data is in English. And the data you are trying to search for is tagged amenity=recycling or amenity=recycling_point. Your trying to search for it using French terms (as shown in the table you have below) .. some work, some don't. This would be an application issue? Rather than

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - temperature

On February 11, 2015 6:16:39 PM CST, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 12/02/2015 10:25 AM, John F. Eldredge wrote: > > On February 11, 2015 3:59:45 PM CST, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> On 12/02/2015 3:45 AM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote: > >> Most air conditioners here have the abili

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - temperature

Getting further and further away from tag:temperature= On 12/02/2015 12:37 PM, John F. Eldredge wrote: On February 11, 2015 6:16:39 PM CST, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: On 12/02/2015 10:25 AM, John F. Eldredge wrote: On February 11, 2015 3:59:45 PM CST, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - temperature

> On Feb 6, 2015, at 8:03 PM, Kotya Karapetyan wrote: > > 1) +1 to drop Kelvins. > > 2) heated/cooled is a nice idea, but I wouldn't like seeing too many > top level tags. > Danger-cold cold cool mild warm hot danger-hot I don’t think is unreasonable if we’re going to have qualitative tags,

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - temperature

On 12/02/2015 1:23 PM, johnw wrote: On Feb 6, 2015, at 8:03 PM, Kotya Karapetyan wrote: 1) +1 to drop Kelvins. 2) heated/cooled is a nice idea, but I wouldn't like seeing too many top level tags. Danger-cold cold cool mild warm hot danger-hot I don’t think is unreasonable if we’re going to

Re: [Tagging] Nominatim mysteries

On 2015-02-12 02:22, Warin wrote : Hi, Thanks for your reply. The OSM data is in English. And the data you are trying to search for is tagged amenity=recycling or amenity=recycling_point. Your t

Re: [Tagging] Nominatim mysteries

On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 4:24 AM, André Pirard wrote: > That's adding another problem: where? If I look at the fuzzy statement > "(comment: why? nobody has told us anything -> Discussion)" that could be > the discussion page, but if I look at it ... > > The Nominatim FAQ [1] mentions 2 sources [2

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - temperature

>>> >> Danger-cold >> cold >> cool >> mild >> warm >> hot >> danger-hot > > But first temperature= > But first temperature= ... the rest can come later as required. gotcha - those 7 qualitative tags should be included, besides numerical values expressed in C. You are correct, the method,

Re: [Tagging] Nominatim mysteries

On 12/02/2015 2:24 PM, André Pirard wrote: On 2015-02-12 02:22, Warin wrote : Hi, Thanks for your reply. Your welcome. The OSM data is in English. And the data you are trying to search for is tagged amenity=recycling or amenity=recycling_point. Your trying to search for it using French t

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - temperature

On 12/02/2015 3:51 PM, johnw wrote: Danger-cold cold cool mild warm hot danger-hot But first temperature= But first temperature= ... the rest can come later as required. gotcha - those 7 qualitative tags should be included, besides numerical values expressed in C. You are correct, the method

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - temperature

tepid and mild are synonyms, so tepid should cover mild in that way. usually tepid is for liquids, and mild is for air / weather, when it comes to temperature, AFAIK. Is ambient is for the ambient air/weather, ambient ground temp, or ambient material temperature? the ambient temperature of the

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - temperature

On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 8:51 PM, johnw wrote: > >>> > >> Danger-cold > >> cold > >> cool > >> mild > >> warm > >> hot > >> danger-hot What are some example nodes, where this proposed tag may apply, and how you might suggest tagging. Here are a few possible nodes I thought of:

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - temperature

On 12/02/2015 6:08 PM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote: On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 8:51 PM, johnw > wrote: >>> >> Danger-cold >> cold >> cool >> mild >> warm >> hot >> danger-hot What are some example nodes, where this proposed tag may apply, and how you