On 08/01/2015 09:35, Steve Doerr wrote:
On 08/01/2015 01:21, Dave F. wrote:
Are they relevant? If so, what are they for? The wiki suggests
they're superseded:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:boundary#Relation_members
No it doesn't, it says they're 'optional, disputed, and redund
On 09/01/2015 01:53, Tom Pfeifer wrote:
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote on 2015-01-09 00:56:
denomination=none
;-)
Nice, but we need to stay on the religion= level
But couldn't the sharing be inter-denominational, rather than
inter-religion?
As I see it:
1. No specific religion, such as rooms
On 2015-01-09 12:25, Dave F. wrote:
> I'll leave them for now, as I can work around them, but I'm still not
> convinced of their use or comments given by others as reasons to keep them.
> "Out of respect to the mappers who have gone before you," isn't a valid
> excuse to keep data if it's i
On 01/01/2015 00:39, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 01/01/15 00:36, Dave F. wrote:
I'm struggling to comprehend how a button to turn off the notes layer,
that's separate (& hidden!) from the only obvious button to turn the
layer on can be described as 'logical' to an experienced user let alone
a newbie..
This appears to be nothing to do with "tagging" - you've presumably
sent to this list by mistake...
2015-01-09 12:12 GMT+00:00 Dave F. :
> On 01/01/2015 00:39, Tom Hughes wrote:
>>
>> On 01/01/15 00:36, Dave F. wrote:
>>
>>> I'm struggling to comprehend how a button to turn off the notes layer,
>>
Apologies & Thanks.
On 09/01/2015 12:17, Dan S wrote:
This appears to be nothing to do with "tagging" - you've presumably
sent to this list by mistake...
2015-01-09 12:12 GMT+00:00 Dave F. :
On 01/01/2015 00:39, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 01/01/15 00:36, Dave F. wrote:
I'm struggling to comprehen
Wouldn't it be simplest to leave the "religion" or "denomination" tag
out, if the facility isn't specific to a particular religion or
denomination?
__John
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 11:30 AM, Dave F. wrote:
> On 09/01/2015 01:53, Tom Pfeifer wrote:
>>
>> Martin Koppenhoefer wrote on 2015-01-09 00:5
On Fri, 2015-01-09 at 12:52 +, John Sturdy wrote:
> Wouldn't it be simplest to leave the "religion" or "denomination" tag
> out, if the facility isn't specific to a particular religion or
> denomination?
>
> __John
>
I think religion=multi is a good tag for this type of facility.
Multi-faith
On 09.01.2015 13:52, John Sturdy wrote:
> Wouldn't it be simplest to leave the "religion" or "denomination" tag
> out, if the facility isn't specific to a particular religion or
> denomination?
>
> __John
Hi,
I see this problem:
Where is the difference between a multifaith place and an object wi
"multi" fits the sports tagging scheme well, and I think it is best for the
religion tag too.
"All"is not good, as most sports places don have a clay sumo ring or a sandy
pit for beach volleyball set up, so "all" would be wrong.
Similarly, animal sacrifice and practicing voodoo at the airport
On 10/01/2015 00:17, John Willis wrote:
Similarly, animal sacrifice and practicing voodoo at the airport's prayer room
might get you arrested.
Not even poodles? :)
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2015-January/020847.html
Cheers,
Andy
As poodles are always the litmus test for new tags, toy poodles are
acceptable, full poodles are not. You can stash your sacrifice in your
carry-on quite quickly if need be - if it's a toy poodle.
Javbw
> On Jan 10, 2015, at 9:23 AM, SomeoneElse wrote:
>
>> On 10/01/2015 00:17, John Willis
12 matches
Mail list logo
