Re: [Tagging] Problem with airport classification

Mateusz Konieczny Wrote in message: > So, would it be OK to assume that large airports are important and small ones > (including mapped as nodes) > are unimportant? Area size, take off count and passenger count does not give the only small heliport in a 2h drive priority. But I think a calc

Re: [Tagging] Change of rendering: place of worship and terminal without building tag

Hi Now that the render amendments have come through, It seems the comment below is inaccurate. It's not being rendered at all. Was that the intention? I was unaware the grey render was considered as 'building', especially since adding building=yes changed the colour. Areas are mapped as reli

Re: [Tagging] Change of rendering: place of worship and terminal without building tag

amenity=place of worship that is not rendered as area is a bug Thanks for a report - it is now on bugtracker as https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/1193 2015-01-04 15:20 GMT+01:00 Dave F. : > Hi > > Now that the render amendments have come through, It seems the comment > be

[Tagging] Adding water=fishpond to the wiki

Our wiki is missing a definition for a body of water used exclusively for fish farming. Since it's a small change to the wiki I thought it would be enough just to contact this list. This is the wiki page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:water If there is a better word, or a tag that is al

Re: [Tagging] Adding water=fishpond to the wiki

On 4 January 2015 at 18:44, Janko Mihelić wrote: > Our wiki is missing a definition for a body of water used exclusively for > fish farming. Since it's a small change to the wiki I thought it would be > enough just to contact this list. This is the wiki page: > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wik

Re: [Tagging] Adding water=fishpond to the wiki

2015-01-04 19:55 GMT+01:00 Matthijs Melissen : > > I would use a subtag, like natural=water, water=pond, pond=fish_pond. > > The paradoxic effect of adding more detailed tags is that the data > gets less useful to data consumers, because most data users won't add > particular processing rules for

Re: [Tagging] Adding water=fishpond to the wiki

But we have also yet an existing tag water=pond for ponds. We would have to change the defination for this tag from “a pond” to “a pond – but not if this is a pond that serves for fishing” – sounds complicate … Lukas Sommer 2015-01-04 20:20 GMT+01:00 Janko Mihelić : > 2015-01-04 19:55 GMT+01:00

Re: [Tagging] Adding water=fishpond to the wiki

2015-01-04 20:25 GMT+01:00 Lukas Sommer : > But we have also yet an existing tag water=pond for ponds. We would > have to change the defination for this tag from “a pond” > to “a pond – but not if this is a pond that serves for fishing” – > sounds complicate … > A pond is the same as a lake - on

Re: [Tagging] Adding water=fishpond to the wiki

Have you looked at what tagging people are using (if any) within landuse=aquaculture and/or landuse=fishfarm areas? On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Janko Mihelić wrote: > 2015-01-04 20:25 GMT+01:00 Lukas Sommer : > >> But we have also yet an existing tag water=pond for ponds. We would >> have to

Re: [Tagging] Adding water=fishpond to the wiki

Hi Janko The tagging would be better IMO if we separate feature and use. Hence this proposal to be refined: Feature natural=water or place =ocean /sea

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Water tap

Humm Only 3 people are concerned enough to vote. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/water_tap So those concerned with the sub tags won't get to discus them. Apathetic? Or? /rant/ I joined this group so I could vote for things .. to get them through due to the inactivity o

Re: [Tagging] Adding water=fishpond to the wiki

2015-01-04 21:49 GMT+01:00 Brad Neuhauser : > Have you looked at what tagging people are using (if any) within > landuse=aquaculture and/or landuse=fishfarm areas? > I have looked now, and they are used pretty inconsistently. Sometimes every fishpond is tagged with it's own landuse=fishfarm/aquac

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Water tap

On 04/01/2015 21:25, Warin wrote: /rant/ I joined this group so I could vote for things . I think you might misunderstand what this list is for. On https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging "About Tagging" says: "Discuss the tags used in OSM, how they could evolve, and how editors

Re: [Tagging] Change of rendering: place of worship and terminal without building tag

I think too that place of worship could follow the established practice for detailed mapping of schools ie: amenity for grounds building for buildings > Which then as I said needs a multpolygon? No? I always thought you were not supposed to have landuse overlap. If the date user or renderer is sm

Re: [Tagging] Adding water=fishpond to the wiki

2015-01-04 22:07 GMT+01:00 althio forum : > Hi Janko > > The tagging would be better IMO if we separate feature and use. > Hence this proposal to be refined: > > Feature > natural=water or place = > ocean

Re: [Tagging] Moveable objects tagged as building=*

Hi, late, but better than never: Thank you for your replies! I tried to sum up some of your ideas at the discussion page of Buildings and added a new section "Mentionable usage" to the page. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Buildings Cheers Tobias ___

Re: [Tagging] Adding water=fishpond to the wiki

On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 5:03 AM, Janko Mihelić wrote: > Ok, I see everyone's against fishponds :) I think I'll use > natural=water+water=pond and a landuse=aquaculture around the whole farm. +1 The landuse=aquaculture tag is easy to use and such areas can include several water=ponds. Almost all

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 64, Issue 20

On 5/01/2015 10:34 AM, tagging-requ...@openstreetmap.org wrote: Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2015 23:03:06 +0100 From: Janko Mihelić To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" Subject: Re: [Tagging] Adding water=fishpond to the wiki Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8