On 27.12.2014 16:20, Andreas Goss wrote:
>> What's wrong with sport=fitness and leisure=sports_centre?
>
> Persoanlly I think it would result in all kind of facilities being tagged
> like this, even though it's not the primary purpose. For example someone
> posted a User Diary entry about rowing c
I notice a quicky increasing number of oneway=no tags on roads, probably due
to editors offering some flashy list box for the oneway key. I wonder what's
next. bridge=no, tunnel=no...?
I find these information-less tags annoying, because you have to browse a
long list of bogus tags on each object
I like the idea of tagging the clubs's entire property as
leisure=sports_centre + sport=rowing, and additionally sport=fitness (or
sport=gymnastics) to the building or room dedicated to that. But I wouldn't
tag it as a leisure=sports_centre on its own. It is only part of the
surrounding sports_cen
On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 7:44 AM, Andreas Goss wrote:
> That's fine for a stuation like that, but do want to join a rowing club
> when you just moved to a city and a looking for a fitness centre to work
> out?
> Because that's my issue when having leisure=sports_centre + sport=rowing
> as tag for
On 28/12/2014 16:01, Friedrich Volkmann wrote:
I think that those editors should only make , "yes" and "-1"
selectable, or omit the "no" values on upload at last, except for motorways,
motorway_links and roundabouts.
I don't believe that there's yet an automatic interface between mailing
list a
> I notice a quicky increasing number of oneway=no tags on roads, probably
> due
> to editors offering some flashy list box for the oneway key. I wonder
> what's
> next. bridge=no, tunnel=no...?
>
> I find these information-less tags annoying, because you have to browse a
> long list of bogus tags
"you'd probably want to discuss that over at
https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues";
I thought that https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/2220 will fix
this problem.
2014-12-28 17:27 GMT+01:00 SomeoneElse :
> On 28/12/2014 16:01, Friedrich Volkmann wrote:
>
>> I think that those editor
Because that's my issue when having leisure=sports_centre + sport=rowing
as tag for your usual commercial gym.
Oops. I mean sport=fitness
(So a rowing club would be fine with leisure=sports_centre +
sport=rowing,fitness)
__
openstreetmap.org/user/AndiG88
wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Us
Hi mapping and cycling friends,
I have suggested an overall parameter for separately drawn cycletracks, to
record crowded links between roadside cycletrack and carriageway:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Traverse_link
Yours'
Ulrich
Hi mapping and cycling friends,
I have suggested an overall parameter for separately drawn cycletracks to
record the (average) layout of crowded crossings of a cycletrack and particular
accessways.
As these crossings at the same time serve as links between cycletrack and
carriageway, the combin
Hi mapping and cycling friends,
I have suggested a special highway-class for the slim tagging of this very
common kind of cycling facilities that up to now affords a combination of four
tags.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/foot_cycleway
Yours'
Ulrich
On Sun, 28 Dec 2014 17:01:16 +0100
Friedrich Volkmann wrote:
> I notice a quicky increasing number of oneway=no tags on roads,
> probably due to editors offering some flashy list box for the oneway
> key.
Or perhaps due to diligent mappers?
> I wonder what's next. bridge=no, tunnel=no...?
If
It is better to map all existing connections between road and cycleway
rather than add this tag
(too complicated, anyway it will be not supported by routers).
2014-12-28 18:29 GMT+01:00 Ulrich Lamm :
> Hi mapping and cycling friends,
>
> I have suggested an overall parameter for separately drawn
Please, stop proposing tags conflicting with widely used ones.
Also, your example with Poland is incorrect (pedestrians have priority over
cyclists).
2014-12-28 18:35 GMT+01:00 Ulrich Lamm :
> Hi mapping and cycling friends,
>
> I have suggested a special highway-class for the slim tagging of th
On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Andreas Goss wrote:
> Because that's my issue when having leisure=sports_centre + sport=rowing
>> as tag for your usual commercial gym.
>>
>
> Oops. I mean sport=fitness
>
> (So a rowing club would be fine with leisure=sports_centre +
> sport=rowing,fitness)
Are
Am 28.12.2014 um 19:20 schrieb Andy Street:.
> These tags are far from "information-less" as they convey the fact that
> a mapper has considered the property in question and wishes to record
> that it does not apply.
I'm afraid that you are kidding yourself in a big way.
Nearly all massive, "I wi
Hello.
In OSM there seems to be concurrent 2 tagging systems for flood
tagging. And each of them seems to be incomplete.
Just to remember: There are several types of flood. I think the most
common types are:
– case 1: caused by heavy rainfall: “on flat or low-lying areas when
the ground is satur
PS: About 57% of the key “flood_prone” is “flood_prone=yes”. About 42%
of the key “flood_prone” is “flood_prone=no”. About 80% of the
elements with the flood_prone key are in 15 km × 15 km area in
Jakarta.
Lukas Sommer
2014-12-28 20:32 GMT+01:00 Lukas Sommer :
> Hello.
>
> In OSM there seems to b
Am 28.12.2014 um 20:42 schrieb tagging-requ...@openstreetmap.org:
> Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2014 19:22:47 +0100
> From: Mateusz Konieczny
> To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools"
>
> Subject: Re: [Tagging] Crowded links between carriageway and
> cycletrack
> Message-ID:
>
Am 28.12.2014 um 20:42 schrieb tagging-requ...@openstreetmap.org:
> From: Mateusz Konieczny
> To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools"
>
> Subject: Re: [Tagging] Shared foot- and cycletracks
> Message-ID:
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Please, stop propo
Water fountains, benches, parking, etc. aren't tagged any different just
because they are located inside a sports centre.
But are people searching for that the same way? If I look for stuff like
that I'm probably somewhere outside and just look what's near me. Then I
probaby realize pretty fas
On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Andreas Goss wrote:
> ess_centre:access=membership, fitness_centre:access=club? private?
> Or have something like fitness_centre=yes? (Not sure as we already have
> sport=*)
>
> Honestly didn't think that much about this, because I just wanted a tag in
> the first
Yes, `amenity` please. A gym is something people want to know about when
traveling, just as much as other tourist stuff, food, lodging, etc.
> On Dec 28, 2014, at 10:25 PM, Clifford Snow wrote:
>
> The only other tag that would work is amenity=fitness_centre. Taginfo would
> indicate that am
Hello,
Following the comments held on this list and on the discussion page on
amenity=public_bookcase, I updated the amenity=public_bookcase wiki page, and
documented how the Little Free Library project can be mapped.
I would now like to propose voting on this proposal. Here is the wiki link:
24 matches
Mail list logo
