Re: [Tagging] [OSM-talk] amenity=bicycle_repair_station :::: only 18 so far

2014-11-15 Thread Bryce Nesbitt
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 10:51 PM, Marc Gemis wrote: > Maybe they are sometimes tagged in another way as shop=bicycle + > service:bicycle:repair=yes and service:bicycle:retail=no > (see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=bicycle?uselang=en-US) > or is this incorrect ? Similar to "amenity

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Pipeline Extensions

2014-11-15 Thread Rainer Fügenstein
hi, (I'm cc'ing this to the list; guess that was your intention) >> f> 1. Please do [not] use type (it should by used only for relations) but add >> f> some works like medium_type or pipeline_type. after careful consideration, my GF came up with "substance". all other options had some "substance

Re: [Tagging] pipeline flow direction; was: Feature Proposal - RFC - Pipeline Extensions

2014-11-15 Thread Rainer Fügenstein
hi hi f> Found one more, loop=* f> Some month ago we were talking on this list about flow of waterways and f> pipelines. f> The far I remember flow_direction=forward/backward/both was mentioned to f> tag the direction a pipeline or canal is used. agreed; it is better to define a tag that can al

Re: [Tagging] pipeline flow direction; was: Feature Proposal - RFC - Pipeline Extensions

2014-11-15 Thread fly
Am 15.11.2014 um 22:38 schrieb Rainer Fügenstein: > > f> Found one more, loop=* > f> Some month ago we were talking on this list about flow of waterways and > f> pipelines. > > f> The far I remember flow_direction=forward/backward/both was mentioned to > f> tag the direction a pipeline or canal i