Hi there,
The vote process of the street cabinet mapping proposal has been closed
yesterday evening.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Street_cabinet
27 users said yes against 1 no, this proposal is accepted :)
Thank you to everyone who gave feedbacks on vote and talk page.
N
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 5:03 AM, johnw wrote:
> A couple more landuse cases were added. I’m going to ask now if it is a good
> idea to specifically exclude Police/fire/safety and give them their own
> landuse(s).
I don't think we need a civic subkey in landuse. When I see the
growing list, it wil
> On Nov 14, 2014, at 8:09 PM, Pieren wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 5:03 AM, johnw wrote:
>> A couple more landuse cases were added. I’m going to ask now if it is a good
>> idea to specifically exclude Police/fire/safety and give them their own
>> landuse(s).
these are just use cases for
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 12:29 PM, johnw wrote:
> it is a subkey for the buildings, to go with building=civic.
My concern is about splitting a landuse polygon just to refine
information that could be stored on buildings themselves for instance.
Pieren
___
I'd like to bring the following proposal to your attention:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/PipelineExtension
it describes a set of tags in addition to the existing
man_made=pipeline and pipeline=marker tags.
thnx for your attention
best regards
_
Am 14.11.2014 um 16:08 schrieb Rainer Fügenstein:
Hey
> I'd like to bring the following proposal to your attention:
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/PipelineExtension
>
> it describes a set of tags in addition to the existing
> man_made=pipeline and pipeline=marker tags.
>
Am 14.11.2014 um 16:43 schrieb fly:
> Am 14.11.2014 um 16:08 schrieb Rainer Fügenstein:
>
> Hey
>
>> I'd like to bring the following proposal to your attention:
>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/PipelineExtension
>>
>> it describes a set of tags in addition to the existing
hi,
f> 1. Please do [not] use type (it should by used only for relations) but add
f> some works like medium_type or pipeline_type.
"type" was largely in use at the time the proposal draft was started,
therefore I kept it, but I see the point of changing it.
"pipeline_type" rather implies what's n
Rainer Fügenstein wrote on 14.11.2014 17:42:
> f> 2. We already have support=* which is used with man_made=surveillance
> f> and is much more in use than mount=*. Do we really need two almost
> f> identical tags ?
> I agree with you on that. any chance to list it on the
> man_made=surveillance wik
> On Nov 14, 2014, at 9:56 PM, Pieren wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 12:29 PM, johnw wrote:
>
>> it is a subkey for the buildings, to go with building=civic.
>
> My concern is about splitting a landuse polygon just to refine
> information that could be stored on buildings themselves for i
Updated and clarified the split of civic into 3 separate keys - civic_admin,
civic_service, and civic_safety. Also discussed judicial and penal.
civic_safety and penal are interesting, because there is no landuse for police
stations, fire stations, jails or prisons. Martin suggested splitting o
11 matches
Mail list logo
