Indeed, Point 2 is also a very widely given situation in Germany. Also in cases
where there are dedicated left turn cycle lanes. (Between the left turn lane
and the through lane for cars.). But the question is, whether we should abandon
cycleway=* tagging on the main road in favor for, let us sa
IMHO cycleway=* should stay. cycleway:lanes= would be (is?) significantly
more complex and it may be used in addition, not instead of cycleway=*.
2014-11-03 18:47 GMT+01:00 Hubert :
> Indeed, Point 2 is also a very widely given situation in Germany. Also in
> cases where there are dedicated left
Am 02.11.2014 um 09:14 schrieb Mateusz Konieczny:
> " I'd argue that tracks are probably a distinct roadway anyway, given
> that they're bollard or curb separated and lane changes to the adjacent
> roadway is illegal."
>
> Yes, for me cycleway=track is equivalent of fixme="mark highway=cycleway
>
So far we have discussed pros and cons of
landuse={governmental|public_administrative|civic}
What about landuse=civil ?
Oxford defines as attribute "of or relating to ordinary citizens and their
concerns,
as distinct from military or ecclesiastical matters", and
in law as "relating to private r
Am 03.11.2014 um 18:56 schrieb Mateusz Konieczny:
> IMHO cycleway=* should stay.
+1
> cycleway:lanes= would be (is?)
> significantly more complex and it may be used in addition, not instead
> of cycleway=*.
so far, it is bicycle:lanes and no real lane-Tagging for the sidepath
(cycleway=track + si
I am editing trails in a US National Park of which I have first hand
knowledge. Nearly all trails in this area have been tagged
"highway=footway" although most of them are open equally to foot
traffic and horse traffic. Any reason to leave them as "footways"? The
wiki suggests that "path" is more
Civic is what I suggested a few months ago. but where the line is drawn is up
for debate: what is included in this catch-all, and what isn’t.
I’ve tried arguing that each class should have their own catch-all landuse -
eg: we have residential/ retail/ industrial/ commericial - and hundreds of
AFIK - footway and path are more toward the width, surface, smoothness,
maintenance level, and expected use of the way. a sidewalk often gets tagged as
footpath, as would be a concrete walkway in a garden.
Paths are usually less maintained, less even, narrower, and lower grade
surfaces.
foot
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 4:02 PM, johnw wrote:
> Civic is what I suggested a few months ago. but where the line is drawn is
> up for debate: what is included in this catch-all, and what isn’t.
>
> I’ve tried arguing that each class should have their own catch-all landuse
> - eg: we have residential
and the line between public and private is not one OSM singles out very much
(is is a public school vs a private school?), but things are separated by
function. and the functions are of a civic government (pnsion offices, taxes,
judicial, etc). I would use the word "public" or “government” but c
ok, now we have landuse={governmental|public_administrative|civic|civil|public}
For my taste, public implies much more openness than we have from some
ministries, immigration offices etc, but is certainly a value to consider.
I would like to put a RFC page together towards the end of the week,
s
Assembling a draft page. it is my first "draft page", so my syntax is kinda
crap. I will be working on the details of the proposal later today.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/landuse%3Dcivic
Javbw
On Nov 4, 2014, at 9:03 AM, Tom Pfeifer wrote:
> ok, now we have
> lan
On 4/11/2014 10:30 AM, tagging-requ...@openstreetmap.org wrote:
Message: 6
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2014 08:14:11 +0900
From: johnw
To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools"
Subject: Re: [Tagging] path vs footway
Message-ID: <49514f61-bdf8-4b1b-84e8-0003db60f...@mac.com>
Content-Type:
Went hiking on mt Miyogi yesterday in Gunma, and like other steep mountain
parks, sections of the trail were near vertical or completely vertical sections
of trail that have to be climbed by chains and occasional footholds. the
longest was over 30m. the shortest was about 4m.
http://www.opens
Is this the type of thing you are talking about:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/via_ferrata
Mike
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 8:28 PM, johnw wrote:
> Went hiking on mt Miyogi yesterday in Gunma, and like other steep mountain
> parks, sections of the trail were near vertical or co
15 matches
Mail list logo
