Well, they re not open to the public - only the designated houses in the area
can use their station, not anyone else. You don’t use other people’s stations.
There is one closer to my house, but I’m not allowed to use it, because the one
pictred is “ours”. it is regualrly maintained, on rotation,
Sure, but I think it is best to do that in addition and not instead of
cycleway=* tagging. For one it takes more effort, 2. the cases where the
bike lane is in the middle of the road is limited. (not counting parking
lanes). 3. cycleway=track would look funny using that scheme. Also adding
more
"2. the cases where the bike lane is in the middle of the road is limited"
- bicycle lane in
the middle is standard before advanced stop line (to be on the left side of
right-turn) -
at least in Poland
"3. “cycleway=track” would look funny using that scheme" - cycleway=track
is anyway
not compatib
Hi,
I've already edited Rational paragraph to give a better description with
distinction between buildings where workers can enter.
Secondly, ok for street_cabinet=waste (and maybe
street_cabinet=waste_management if cabinets are encountered with devices to
manage waste transit or storage)
man_ma
I wouldn't touch the page until the voting is over. One can always add new
values when the tag is in use and document them when needed. New building
types are also added all the time. No need to document it right away.
just my .5 cents
m
On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 11:05 PM, François Lacombe <
franco
On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Mateusz Konieczny
wrote:
> "2. the cases where the bike lane is in the middle of the road is
> limited" - bicycle lane in
> the middle is standard before advanced stop line (to be on the left side
> of right-turn) -
> at least in Poland
>
Not unheard of to common
