2014-10-13 23:24 GMT+02:00 Zbigniew Czernik :
>
> What if there are several people in the grave (with different names)?
> Semicolons?
>
I think OSM shouldn't have names of people in the grave. What you are
saying is that, when OSM database is complete, we should have one relation
for every person
On Tue, 2014-10-14 at 13:51 +0200, Janko Mihelić wrote:
> 2014-10-13 23:24 GMT+02:00 Zbigniew Czernik
> :
>
> What if there are several people in the grave (with different
> names)?
> Semicolons?
>
>
> I think OSM shouldn't have names of people in the grave.
If
2014-10-14 13:55 GMT+02:00 Philip Barnes :
>
> If you don't put the names in OSM what do you propose?
>
> Phil (trigpoint)
>
I think we should have notability, like Wikipedia. I have been using
buried:wikidata=*, and if someone can't get in Wikidata, then I think the
same should apply with OSM. I
Hi! I've noticed today there is an epic voting battle on the fields of
wiki. Hundreds of mappers came to state their disapproval of person
relation type. I wonder how many of them actually mapped one, or even
seen such relations. I found some of them in 2011, and posted an entry
in SHTOSM about suc
Am 13.10.2014 17:15, schrieb Philip Barnes:
> On Mon, 2014-10-13 at 17:00 +0200, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
>> 2014-10-13 12:28 GMT+02:00 :
>>> I like this proposal too, would it be possible to extend it to
>>> tunnels or would that require a similar proposal?
>> Rather a similar proposal, tunnels a
I'm a little bit late to this, since I don't read the list regularly,
but I have some thoughts about this, and I hope something moves
forward.
1. I think that if we render saddles, it would also be good to render
ridge lines. Most maps I've seen render either both or neither. I
think they certainl
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Ilya Zverev wrote:
> Hi! I've noticed today there is an epic voting battle on the fields of
> wiki. Hundreds of mappers came to state their disapproval of person
> relation type. I wonder how many of them actually mapped one, or even
> seen such relations. I found
On 13/10/2014, Janko Mihelić wrote:
> I think OSM isn't a place for this. Number of the grave should be enough,
> and naming people in the grave (if they are not famous) looks like data for
> other databases. What are other uses for this relation type? Home of a
> person, workplace of a person, cu
> On Oct 14, 2014, at 9:39 PM, Janko Mihelić wrote:
>
> I think we should have notability, like Wikipedia.
Every time I mention "importance" or similar, everyone gets in a huff, as they
think that it will start an edit war or something. We trust mappers to do
everything, and make it "local",
Since the mapper of the saddle knows the direction, why can't the saddle have a
directional icon rendered if it is on a way that represents the passable
section of the saddle, following the ridgeline? Simple and effective. I'm sure
the mapper understands the direction of the saddle quite easily.
On 14/10/2014, Pieren wrote:
> Third mistake : It is not strictly reserved for "notable" people and
> can be used to name all graves in a cemetery (which might be forbiden
> in some countries). Privacy is never mentionned. To solve this, you
> could enforce a link to wikipedia because they are alr
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/brickkiln
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Okay, we have 9 votes:
- 5 times approve
- 3 times oppose
- 1 time obstain
I suppose this is not enough?
Lukas Sommer
2014-09-28 14:48 GMT+00:00 Lukas Sommer :
> Hello.
>
> After discussion and some modifications of the proposal, here a request
> for voting on “Tagging for complex junctions or
13 matches
Mail list logo
