Re: [Tagging] The "not-shops": industrial, industry, or business

2014-09-16 Thread Andy Mabbett
On 16 September 2014 07:32, Frederik Ramm wrote: > I think that many people think too much information > science ("how can I compress the most information > into the smallest room") and too little cartography > ("how can I make a map with a good user interface"). You mean people tend not to "tag

Re: [Tagging] The "not-shops": industrial, industry, or business

2014-09-16 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, On 09/16/2014 11:17 AM, Andy Mabbett wrote: >> I think that many people think too much information >> science ("how can I compress the most information >> into the smallest room") and too little cartography >> ("how can I make a map with a good user interface"). > > You mean people tend not t

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Tagging for complex junctions or traffic signals that are named

2014-09-16 Thread fly
Am 16.09.2014 08:54, schrieb Lukas Sommer: > > > Would it not be more straight forward to use junction=traffic_signal in > Japan and only use highway=traffic_signal for the real lights ? > > > Hm, I’m not sure. It could separete clearly the individual traffic > signals from the traffic

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Tagging for complex junctions or traffic signals that are named

2014-09-16 Thread Satoshi IIDA
> The name belongs to the junction and not to the traffic_signal, or am I wrong ? In Japan, Hokkaido region, there is 4 traffic_signals on 1 junction. Each traffic_signals and 1 junction has different name. Indeed it is rare case. But I think we need Lukas's idea to support it. 2014-09-16 23:38

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Tagging for complex junctions or traffic signals that are named

2014-09-16 Thread Lukas Sommer
We have a different situation in Japan (normally/mostly the name belongs to the traffic signal system) and a different situation in Korea (the name belongs to the junction). Currently in OSM we use yet highway=traffic_signals for traffic signal names in Japan. And we use yet junction=yes for juncti

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Tagging for complex junctions or traffic signals that are named

2014-09-16 Thread Pieren
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 6:38 PM, Lukas Sommer wrote: > Currently in OSM we use yet > highway=traffic_signals for traffic signal names in Japan. And we use yet > junction=yes for junction names in Korea. Sounds easy but... how do you tag a named junction with a traffic signal ? highway=traffic_sig

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Tagging for complex junctions or traffic signals that are named

2014-09-16 Thread Lukas Sommer
> how do you tag a named junction with a traffic signal ? > highway=traffic_signal + junction=yes + name=* means that "name" is > for the junction or for the traffic signals ? For the junction! For a named junction with a (not named) traffic signal: junction=yes + highway=traffic_signals. (Quite

[Tagging] How to tag a landmark clock

2014-09-16 Thread Andy Mabbett
How should this clock: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chamberlain_Clock http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/187104810 be tagged? It's a notable landmark, but not a memorial. -- Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing http://pigsonthewing.org.uk ___ Tagging m

Re: [Tagging] How to tag a landmark clock

2014-09-16 Thread Brad Neuhauser
How about man_made=tower instead of historic=tower? You could also add start_date=1903 to show the age. On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 3:10 PM, Andy Mabbett wrote: > How should this clock: > >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chamberlain_Clock > >http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/187104810 > > be t

Re: [Tagging] How to tag a landmark clock

2014-09-16 Thread Tom Pfeifer
Andy Mabbett wrote on 2014-09-16 22:10: How should this clock: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chamberlain_Clock http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/187104810 be tagged? It's a notable landmark, but not a memorial. It is already amenity=clock and has a name. You might add tourism=attrac

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Tagging for complex junctions or traffic signals that are named

2014-09-16 Thread johnw
Correct me if I'm wrong, but it sounds like the end goal is: - to have junction names in korea, regardless of if they are traffic lights, and the symbol used there doesn't imply traffic lights, just a junction. - In Japan, the old junction system evolved to be named traffic signals, and the sy

Re: [Tagging] What's the difference in these tags?

2014-09-16 Thread Michael Kugelmann
Am 15.09.2014 13:26, schrieb Dave F.: oneway=yes to access:backward=no oneway=yes is used sinde 10 years, IMHO there is no reason for a change! just my 2 cents, Michael. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap

Re: [Tagging] What's the difference in these tags?

2014-09-16 Thread Bryce Nesbitt
I map contraflow as dual carriageway, to avoid this issue. Both sides get oneway=yes, plus a full list of the modes allowed (psv, bicycle, etc). ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] The "not-shops": industrial, industry, or business

2014-09-16 Thread Bryce Nesbitt
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 11:32 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote: > A map icon is what, 32x32 pixels or so? A couple of millimeters on the > screen. As long as you stick to 20 POI icons, you will be able to select > icons that are instantly recognizable. Something with a film strip... > must be a cinema. On

Re: [Tagging] What's the difference in these tags?

2014-09-16 Thread Paul Johnson
This breaks routing where there is no dual carriageway. On Sep 16, 2014 7:01 PM, "Bryce Nesbitt" wrote: > I map contraflow as dual carriageway, to avoid this issue. > Both sides get oneway=yes, plus a full list of the modes allowed (psv, > bicycle, etc). > > __