Re: [Tagging] English translations in non-english countries

Thanks for the thoughtful replies. I understand the issue now. With the multitude of: - places to get information - areas of responsibility (EG OSM tagging is somewhat separate form rendering) - mailing lists of different groups. - Language pages of the different languages being used in

Re: [Tagging] English translations in non-english countries

Missed that in August. Great to see it is being discussed at any level. On Sep 14, 2014, at 12:21 AM, Satoshi IIDA wrote: > > wow! > > > https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/803 > My previous text should be "insisted" (past, at that time). > I'll follow the current issu

[Tagging] What's the difference in these tags?

Hi A user has changed some tags of a way: 1. oneway=yes to access:backward=no 2. psv=opposite_lane to psv:backward=yes What are the differences between the tags? The originals are the more commonly used. I'm unsure how it adds any detail or clarity to the database. You thoughts please. Dav

Re: [Tagging] What's the difference in these tags?

2014-09-15 13:26 GMT+02:00 Dave F. : > A user has changed some tags of a way: > > 1. oneway=yes to access:backward=no > > 2. psv=opposite_lane to psv:backward=yes > > What are the differences between the tags? The originals are the more > commonly used. I'm unsure how it adds any detail or clarity

Re: [Tagging] What's the difference in these tags?

Hi, On 09/15/2014 01:26 PM, Dave F. wrote: > You thoughts please. I think the user has it backwards. Bye Frederik -- Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33" ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://

Re: [Tagging] What's the difference in these tags?

Am 15.09.2014 14:20, schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer: > > 2014-09-15 13:26 GMT+02:00 Dave F. >: > > A user has changed some tags of a way: No need for a change as it is possible to simply add your new tags > 1. oneway=yes to access:backward=no > > 2. psv

Re: [Tagging] English translations in non-english countries

Okay, I’ve tried to update the old wiki pages (multilanguage names etc.) Lukas Sommer 2014-09-15 10:47 GMT+00:00 johnw : > Missed that in August. Great to see it is being discussed at any level. > > > On Sep 14, 2014, at 12:21 AM, Satoshi IIDA wrote: > > > wow! > > > https://github.com/gravitys

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Tagging for complex junctions or traffic signals that are named

Okay, I’ve tried to work out more in detail idea 4. Please considere https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Tagging_for_complex_junctions_or_traffic_signals_that_are_named and make comments. Lukas Sommer 2014-09-02 4:50 GMT+00:00 Satoshi IIDA : > > Hello from Japan, > > > @Lukas a

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Tagging for complex junctions or traffic signals that are named

Hey Would it not be more straight forward to use junction=traffic_signal in Japan and only use highway=traffic_signal for the real lights ? Just my two ct fly Am 15.09.2014 19:24, schrieb Lukas Sommer: > Okay, I’ve tried to work out more in detail idea 4. Please considere > https://wiki.openstre

Re: [Tagging] The "not-shops": industrial, industry, or business

Maybe this is running up on the limit of only rendering shop values with 100 instances? That would exclude things like: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3073844460 Or the dog collar shop http://www.pacocollars.com/ (sells only dog collars). --- As an alternative to the blacklist appro

Re: [Tagging] English translations in non-english countries

On 2014-09-13 17:02, Matthijs Melissen wrote : > On 13 September 2014 15:41, Satoshi IIDA wrote: >> But a few insists the bilingual RENDERING on osm.org or on other >> alternative (apps or tiles or so). > This suggestion is in fact currently under discussion: > https://github.com/gravitystorm/ope

Re: [Tagging] problem with bicycle=designated

On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 6:36 AM, Andre Engels wrote: > I myself, and I think more Dutch mappers, are using bicycle=designated > (along with highway=residential or perhaps highway=unclassified) for a > so called "fietsstraat" ("cyclestreet"). It's a road that has been set > up for bicycles, but ha

Re: [Tagging] The "not-shops": industrial, industry, or business

Hi, On 09/15/2014 07:43 PM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote: > Maybe this is running up on the limit of only rendering shop values with > 100 instances? I think that many people think too much information science ("how can I compress the most information into the smallest room") and too little cartography ("

Re: [Tagging] problem with bicycle=designated

I'm going to throw Dallas and Tulsa into that mix, too. On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 11:47 PM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote: > On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 6:36 AM, Andre Engels > wrote: > >> I myself, and I think more Dutch mappers, are using bicycle=designated >> (along with highway=residential or perhaps highw

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Tagging for complex junctions or traffic signals that are named

> > Would it not be more straight forward to use junction=traffic_signal in > Japan and only use highway=traffic_signal for the real lights ? > Hm, I’m not sure. It could separete clearly the individual traffic signals from the traffic signal system/the covered area. The downside would be that we