Re: [Tagging] include smoothness=* in JOSM presets?

On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 11:16 PM, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > There are some sidewalks with allowed cycling but completely decayed paving > stones and there > is no better way to tag this. There are also some asphalt roads with really > bad surface. etc etc. I didn't check your application but the

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - nudism

Hi everybody, i would like to bring the tag "nudism" to vote Several issues of the discussion have been included in the proposal page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Nudism [1] VOTING STARTS TODAY and will END ON 19.07.2014 with hopefully many votes from all of you Best

[Tagging] "floating" or "pontoon" bridges?

Hi, the approved and currently active proposal for bridges is not quite clear on this - the older "bridge=pontoon" was not obsoleted but a new "bridge=yes"+"bridge:structure=floating" was introduced with the description "A bridge whose load is supported by floating on water, rather than resting

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - nudism

2014-09-02 12:03 GMT+02:00 Heiko Wöhrle : > i would like to bring the tag "nudism" to vote > Several issues of the discussion have been included in the proposal page > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Nudism > > Thank you for pushing this. In the meantime I have been in holid

Re: [Tagging] "floating" or "pontoon" bridges?

2014-09-02 12:16 GMT+02:00 Richard Z. : > Are there floating bridges other than pontoon bridges? > yes, there are bridges supported by boats. These are generally not called "pontoon". > > Should pontoon be moved into bridge:structure and replace > "floating"? > for me "floating" isn't a ki

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - nudism

Hi Martin, there were some other comments concerning the clothing/dresscode issue. In my opinion it is not the task of osm to adivce people about their clothing. Who would render those advices, and how? Who would search for that information on osm? Nudism is an exception, because there are

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - nudism

> > *Voting starts today* and will *end on 19.07.2014* with hopefully many votes > from all of you > > I think you mean 19.09.2014 ;-) 2014-09-02 7:03 GMT-03:00 Heiko Wöhrle : > Hi everybody, > > i would like to bring the tag "nudism" to vote > Several issues of the discussion have been inclu

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - cliff clarification

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/cliff_clarification This is to refine/cleanup the definition of natural=cliff in the Wiki, in order to make that existing map feature usable for applications. -- Friedrich K. Volkmann http://www.volki.at/ Adr.: Davidgasse 76-80/14/10, 1

Re: [Tagging] "floating" or "pontoon" bridges?

yes, there are bridges supported by boats. These are generally not called > "pontoon". > > Wikipedia does not agree with Martin: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pontoon_bridge Ther are at least four boat bridges in Veneto mapped as bridge=pontoon Way 38380495

Re: [Tagging] "floating" or "pontoon" bridges?

2014-09-02 16:14 GMT+02:00 Volker Schmidt : > Wikipedia does not agree with Martin: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pontoon_bridge > it depends on the language ;-) http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ponton cheers, Martin ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@ope

Re: [Tagging] "floating" or "pontoon" bridges?

Here in Western Washington we call them pontoons. See http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/Projects/SR520/Pontoons.htm We've never properly tagged the bridge type but they are pontoons. These pontoons do not look like the wiki picture, but are big boxes which are anchored to the lake/ocean floor. BTW - these

Re: [Tagging] "floating" or "pontoon" bridges?

Pontoon bridge is the only term I am familiar with for such bridges. On September 2, 2014 9:55:00 AM CDT, Clifford Snow wrote: > Here in Western Washington we call them pontoons. See > http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/Projects/SR520/Pontoons.htm > > We've never properly tagged the bridge type but they

Re: [Tagging] "floating" or "pontoon" bridges?

On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 04:22:34PM +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > 2014-09-02 16:14 GMT+02:00 Volker Schmidt : > > > Wikipedia does not agree with Martin: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pontoon_bridge > > > > > it depends on the language ;-) language problems are a disaster for us. Yeste

Re: [Tagging] "floating" or "pontoon" bridges?

2014-09-02 17:29 GMT+02:00 Richard Z. : > Something like "pontoon bridge" is definitely much better than > "floating bridge" which may have any number of meanings for different > people - google image search is my favorite method to look for > meanings. > IMHO "floating bridge" is hardly to be

Re: [Tagging] "floating" or "pontoon" bridges?

On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 8:39 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > IMHO "floating bridge" is hardly to be misunderstood when speaking about > bridge types, and also the Google image search seems to confirm that this > is an established term. Where ships might beconsidered "pontoons" when used > as brid

Re: [Tagging] "floating" or "pontoon" bridges?

> > Wikipedia does not agree with Martin: >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pontoon_bridge >> > > > it depends on the language ;-) > > http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ponton > > ... more on the selection of the correct Wikipedia page: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pontonbr%C3%BCcke :-) Volker _

Re: [Tagging] Ablution area

2014-08-31 16:28 GMT+02:00 Mishari Muqbil : > How about if it was amenity=ablution and religion=* or even religion=yes? > > On more complex objects it will not be clear how religion tag should be applied. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.or

Re: [Tagging] "floating" or "pontoon" bridges?

2014-09-02 17:46 GMT+02:00 Clifford Snow : > Then again if I made a pontoon out of concrete, they'd just sink. While I generally agree with your agreement, this is not true, ships can be built out of concrete (think aircraft carriers for instance), and German universities even hold a regular c

Re: [Tagging] Unification of google-plus links

> > Why use contact: here, when it's not used by the majority anywhere else. +1 2014-08-29 22:46 GMT-03:00 Andreas Goss : > I don't want to change the addr:-, website-, phone-, fax- or >> email-key!!! I never said it. >> > > As Tobias pointed out, we have to look at the bigger pucture. Why use

Re: [Tagging] "floating" or "pontoon" bridges?

On 9/2/14 1:12 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > 2014-09-02 17:46 GMT+02:00 Clifford Snow >: > > Then again if I made a pontoon out of concrete, they'd just sink. > > > > > While I generally agree with your agreement, this is not true, ships > can be built out

Re: [Tagging] "floating" or "pontoon" bridges?

The key is to have enough empty space at the center, so that the overall density is less than that of water. On September 2, 2014 12:12:02 PM CDT, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > 2014-09-02 17:46 GMT+02:00 Clifford Snow : > > > Then again if I made a pontoon out of concrete, they'd just sink. >

[Tagging] The "not-shops": industrial, industry, or business

Hi all, Sometimes shop=*, office=* and craft=* do not adequately cover all business types. For example, I have mapped an industrial area that includes the following businesses: 1. A fork lift truck hire company (business to business sales). 2. A commercial bakery selling to business producing goo

Re: [Tagging] "floating" or "pontoon" bridges?

On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > While I generally agree with your agreement, this is not true, ships can > be built out of concrete (think aircraft carriers for instance), and German > universities even hold a regular competition who builds the best canoe out > of (f