> Il giorno 15/ago/2014, alle ore 23:52, St Niklaas ha
> scritto:
>
> I would go for building=bridge, since a bridge is a building
actually a bridge isn't a building according to standard terminology, it is a
structure. But since in osm it seems we are using building synonymously for all
k
> Il giorno 15/ago/2014, alle ore 16:31, Peter Wendorff
> ha scritto:
>
> not a good idea IMHO.
+1, I think it has several problems, eg that it would slowdown overall
development of tagging and rendering (why should mapper joe add tags to
describe something well if it already renders with
> Il giorno 14/ago/2014, alle ore 17:02, "Richard Z." ha
> scritto:
>
> any good name for such a tag? It should be also good for dips if possible..
maybe "hazard"=* ?
cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 05:50:06PM +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
>
> > Il giorno 15/ago/2014, alle ore 23:52, St Niklaas ha
> > scritto:
> >
> > I would go for building=bridge, since a bridge is a building
>
>
> actually a bridge isn't a building according to standard terminology, it i
On 16.08.2014 17:50, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
>> Il giorno 15/ago/2014, alle ore 23:52, St Niklaas ha
>> scritto:
>>
>> I would go for building=bridge, since a bridge is a building
>
> actually a bridge isn't a building according to standard terminology, it is a
> structure. But since in o
Am 16.08.2014 17:50, schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
>
>
>> Il giorno 15/ago/2014, alle ore 23:52, St Niklaas ha
>> scritto:
>>
>> I would go for building=bridge, since a bridge is a building
>
>
> actually a bridge isn't a building according to standard terminology, it is a
> structure. But si
