> But what if we separate the pool from the landuse? make it a water feature
> (because it is usually briney seawater at first), and place it in the
> landuse the tagger feels is appropriate? Industrial for a large plant, a
> farm field (or comemrical?) for a little one?
>
In situation like this (
> Am 27/lug/2014 um 08:49 schrieb johnw :
>
> I think adding a subtag would eventually depreciate the amenity=townhall ,
> community_centre / community_hall, and library - at least as stand-alone
> facilities
I don't think so. It would be regression to step back from townhall and library
to
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 09:51:28AM +0200, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
>
> In situation like this (both landuse=* and landuse=retail fits) I usually
> use retail for shops open to anybody and landuse=* for specialist ones.not
> open for public,
Perhaps it would be better to use the trade tag?
http://
> Landuse doesn't seem to fit very well when we have these (general) shop
> tags.
>
Yes, I am using also shop tag. But sometimes area is so large that it
deserves its own landuse.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstree
How do you map a building's land w/o a landuse area then? Most every building
has some kind of space around it beyond its foundation, especially if it is
designed for car traffic over foot traffic - parking lots, etc.
Javbw
> On Jul 28, 2014, at 7:29 AM, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
>
>
>> Land
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 10:28 PM, Greg Morgan
wrote:
>
> I'd say make the changes at the city admin level for these reasons. The
> tribal nations are viewed by the courts as territories but they tend to act
> more at the city[4] to county[3] COG [1] level. The squabbles feel more
> like cities f
